ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: Translating Guidelines into Clinical Practice.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Review of Pancreatic Cysts and Malignancy in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Transplant Recipients.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Observational
- Endoscopic-guided chemoablation of an inoperable main-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of cystic neoplasms using EUS, MRI, and CT scan and treatment strategy.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cyst Management: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Clinical Perspectives on the Histomolecular Features of the Pancreatic Precursor Lesions: A Narrative Review.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2024Review
- Article
- Novel Insights into Postoperative Surveillance in Resected Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms-A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Cystic Pancreatic Lesions Diagnosed on Endoscopic Ultrasound: Frequency, Morphology, and Factors Associated with Malignant Nature of these Lesions.Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A combination of several factors, including the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging and an aging population, has led to pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) becoming the most detected incidental pancreatic lesions. Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of PCLs is challenging. In the last decade, several evidence-based guidelines have been published addressing the diagnosis and management of PCLs. However, these guidelines cover different subsets of patients with PCLs and offer varying recommendations regarding diagnostic assessment, surveillance, and surgical resection. Further, recent studies comparing the accuracy of various guidelines have reported significant variations in the rate of missed cancer versus unnecessary surgical resections. In clinical practice, it is challenging to decide which guideline to follow specifically. This article reviews the varying recommendations of the major guidelines and results of comparative studies, provides an overview of newer modalities not included in the guidelines, and offers perspectives on translating the guidelines into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.