ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Assessing the Impact of Image Resolution on Deep Learning for TB Lesion Segmentation on Frontal Chest X-rays.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benefits of high-magnification and color information in computational pathology-An exploratory review.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Editorial on Special Issue "Artificial Intelligence in Image-Based Screening, Diagnostics, and Clinical Care".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Semantically redundant training data removal and deep model classification performance: A study with chest X-rays.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models are state-of-the-art in segmenting anatomical and disease regions of interest (ROIs) in medical images. Particularly, a large number of DL-based techniques have been reported using chest X-rays (CXRs). However, these models are reportedly trained on reduced image resolutions for reasons related to the lack of computational resources. Literature is sparse in discussing the optimal image resolution to train these models for segmenting the tuberculosis (TB)-consistent lesions in CXRs. In this study, we investigated the performance variations with an Inception-V3 UNet model using various image resolutions with/without lung ROI cropping and aspect ratio adjustments and identified the optimal image resolution through extensive empirical evaluations to improve TB-consistent lesion segmentation performance. We used the Shenzhen CXR dataset for the study, which includes 326 normal patients and 336 TB patients. We proposed a combinatorial approach consisting of storing model snapshots, optimizing segmentation threshold and test-time augmentation (TTA), and averaging the snapshot predictions, to further improve performance with the optimal resolution. Our experimental results demonstrate that higher image resolutions are not always necessary; however, identifying the optimal image resolution is critical to achieving superior performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.