ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Machine Learning Augmented Interpretation of Chest X-rays: A Systematic Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06075836 (Utility of an AI-based CXR Interpretation Tool in Assisting Diagnostic Accuracy, Speed, and Confidence of Healthcare Professionals), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Utility of an AI-based CXR Interpretation Tool in Assisting Diagnostic Accuracy, Speed, and Confidence of Healthcare Professionals: a Study Using 500 Retrospectively Collected Inpatient and Emergency Department CXRs From Two UK Hospital Trusts
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Lung ultrasound interpretation using deep learning for the detection of B-lines in dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Foundation models for X-ray interpretation: a narrative review of current techniques and future perspectives in diagnostic imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- Using Machine Learning Methods to Predict Hospitalization Based on Brixia Score and Patient Clinical Data (from the COVID-19 Pandemic).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Application of deep learning methods in the classification of normal and pneumonia lung images.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Nature-Inspired Multi-Level Thresholding Integrated with CNN for Accurate COVID-19 and Lung Disease Classification in Chest X-Ray Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinicians' Agreement on Extrapulmonary Radiographic Findings in Chest X-Rays Using a Diagnostic Labelling Scheme.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A hybrid dense convolutional network and fuzzy inference system for pneumonia diagnosis with dynamic symptom tracking.PloS one · 2025Article
- AI-assisted detection for chest X-rays (AID-CXR): a multi-reader multi-case study protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted double reading of chest radiographs to detect clinically relevant missed findings: a two-centre evaluation.European radiology · 2024Article
- Article
- A deep learning feature extraction-based hybrid approach for detecting pediatric pneumonia in chest X-ray images.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- Early user perspectives on using computer-aided detection software for interpreting chest X-ray images to enhance access and quality of care for persons with tuberculosis.BMC global and public health · 2023Review
- Analysis of Line and Tube Detection Performance of a Chest X-ray Deep Learning Model to Evaluate Hidden Stratification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- AI-Based CXR First Reading: Current Limitations to Ensure Practical Value.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limitations of the chest X-ray (CXR) have resulted in attempts to create machine learning systems to assist clinicians and improve interpretation accuracy. An understanding of the capabilities and limitations of modern machine learning systems is necessary for clinicians as these tools begin to permeate practice. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of machine learning applications designed to facilitate CXR interpretation. A systematic search strategy was executed to identify research into machine learning algorithms capable of detecting >2 radiographic findings on CXRs published between January 2020 and September 2022. Model details and study characteristics, including risk of bias and quality, were summarized. Initially, 2248 articles were retrieved, with 46 included in the final review. Published models demonstrated strong standalone performance and were typically as accurate, or more accurate, than radiologists or non-radiologist clinicians. Multiple studies demonstrated an improvement in the clinical finding classification performance of clinicians when models acted as a diagnostic assistance device. Device performance was compared with that of clinicians in 30% of studies, while effects on clinical perception and diagnosis were evaluated in 19%. Only one study was prospectively run. On average, 128,662 images were used to train and validate models. Most classified less than eight clinical findings, while the three most comprehensive models classified 54, 72, and 124 findings. This review suggests that machine learning devices designed to facilitate CXR interpretation perform strongly, improve the detection performance of clinicians, and improve the efficiency of radiology workflow. Several limitations were identified, and clinician involvement and expertise will be key to driving the safe implementation of quality CXR machine learning systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.