Utility and Limitations of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Lymphadenopathy.

backgroundFine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a valuable tool for evaluating lymphadenopathy. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and effectiveness of FNAC in the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy.

methodsCytological characteristics were evaluated in 432 patients who underwent lymph node FNAC and follow-up biopsy at the Korea Cancer Center Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019.

resultsFifteen (3.5%) of the four hundred and thirty-two patients were diagnosed as inadequate by FNAC, with five (33.3%) of these diagnosed as metastatic carcinoma on histological examination. Of the 432 patients, 155 (35.9%) were diagnosed as benign by FNAC, with seven (4.5%) of these diagnosed histologically as metastatic carcinoma. A review of the FNAC slides, however, showed no evidence of cancer cells, suggesting that the negative results may have been due to FNAC sampling errors. An additional five samples regarded as benign on FNAC were diagnosed as non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) by histological examination. Of the 432 patients, 223 (51.6%) were cytologically diagnosed as malignant, with 20 (9.0%) of these diagnosed as tissue insufficient for diagnosis (TIFD) or benign on histological examination. A review of the FNAC slides of these 20 patients, however, showed that 17 (85.0%) were positive for malignant cells. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and accuracy of FNAC were 97.8%, 97.5%, 98.7%, 96.0%, and 97.7%, respectively.

conclusionsPreoperative FNAC was safe, practical, and effective in the early diagnosis of lymphadenopathy. This method, however, had limitations in some diagnoses, suggesting that additional attempts may be required according to the clinical situation.