Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36832199›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Low-Dose CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Drainage of Deep Pelvic Fluid Collections after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Technical Success, Clinical Outcome and Safety in 40 Patients.

Robert Stahl, Max Seidensticker, Giovanna Negrão de Figueiredo, Vera Pedersen, Alexander Crispin, Robert Forbrig, Yigit Ozpeynirci, Thomas Liebig, Melvin D'Anastasi, Danilo Hackner and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert StahlInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2788-9316
Max SeidenstickerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2481-5410
Giovanna Negrão de FigueiredoDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstr. 10, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Vera PedersenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0542-5684
Alexander CrispinIBE-Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Robert ForbrigInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Yigit OzpeynirciInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Thomas LiebigInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Melvin D'AnastasiDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4778-5939
Danilo HacknerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University (FAU) Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3161-5094
Christoph G TrummInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1249-3338
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Malta · MTUniversity of Zurich · CHZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the technical (TS) and clinical success (CS) of CT fluoroscopy-guided drainage (CTD) in patients with symptomatic deep pelvic fluid collections following colorectal surgery.

methodsA retrospective analysis (years 2005 to 2020) comprised 43 drain placements in 40 patients undergoing low-dose (10-20 mA tube current) quick-check CTD using a percutaneous transgluteal (

resultsTS was gained in 93.0%. CS was obtained in 83.3% for C-reactive Protein and in 78.6% for Leukocytes. In five patients (12.5%), a reoperation due to an unfavorable clinical outcome was necessary. Total dose length product (DLP) tended to be lower in the second half of the observation period (median: years 2013 to 2020: 544.0 mGy*cm vs. years 2005 to 2012: 735.5 mGy*cm) and was significantly lower for the CT fluoroscopy part (median: years 2013 to 2020: 47.0 mGy*cm vs. years 2005 to 2012: 85.0 mGy*cm).

conclusionsGiven a minor proportion of patients requiring surgical revision due to anastomotic leakage, the CTD of deep pelvic fluid collections is safe and provides an excellent technical and clinical outcome. The reduction of radiation exposition over time can be achieved by both the ongoing development of CT technology and the increased level of interventional radiology (IR) expertise.

Indexed as

clinical outcomecolorectal surgeryCT-guided drainagepelvic fluid collectiontechnical outcome

Identifiers

PMID36832199
PMCPMC9955776
OpenAlexW4320729230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.