Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36832156›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Feature Extraction Using a Residual Deep Convolutional Neural Network (ResNet-152) and Optimized Feature Dimension Reduction for MRI Brain Tumor Classification.

Suganya Athisayamani, Robert Singh Antonyswamy, Velliangiri Sarveshwaran, Meshari Almeshari, Yasser Alzamil, Vinayakumar Ravi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ultrasound-MRI Fusion Deep Learning Radiomics Nomogram: Refining Prognostic Stratification for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Hybrid fractal ConvXGBNet for brain tumor classification with log-cosh dice loss - cascaded V-Net based segmentation based on MRI images.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suganya AthisayamaniSchool of Computing, Sastra Deemed to be University, Thanjavur 613401, India.
Robert Singh AntonyswamyDepartment of Computational Intelligence, School of Computing, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai 603203, India.
Velliangiri SarveshwaranDepartment of Computational Intelligence, School of Computing, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai 603203, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9273-8181
Meshari AlmeshariDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Ha'il, Ha'il 55476, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7838-4081
Yasser AlzamilDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Ha'il, Ha'il 55476, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9478-850X
Vinayakumar RaviCenter for Artificial Intelligence, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Khobar 34754, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6873-6469

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the top causes of mortality in people globally is a brain tumor. Today, biopsy is regarded as the cornerstone of cancer diagnosis. However, it faces difficulties, including low sensitivity, hazards during biopsy treatment, and a protracted waiting period for findings. In this context, developing non-invasive and computational methods for identifying and treating brain cancers is crucial. The classification of tumors obtained from an MRI is crucial for making a variety of medical diagnoses. However, MRI analysis typically requires much time. The primary challenge is that the tissues of the brain are comparable. Numerous scientists have created new techniques for identifying and categorizing cancers. However, due to their limitations, the majority of them eventually fail. In that context, this work presents a novel way of classifying multiple types of brain tumors. This work also introduces a segmentation algorithm known as Canny Mayfly. Enhanced chimpanzee optimization algorithm (EChOA) is used to select the features by minimizing the dimension of the retrieved features. ResNet-152 and the softmax classifier are then used to perform the feature classification process. Python is used to carry out the proposed method on the Figshare dataset. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of the proposed cancer classification system are just a few of the characteristics that are used to evaluate its overall performance. According to the final evaluation results, our proposed strategy outperformed, with an accuracy of 98.85%.

Indexed as

Canny algorithmdeep convolutional neural networkmodified chimp optimization algorithmsoftmax classifierspatial gray level dependence matrix

Identifiers

PMID36832156
PMCPMC9955169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.