ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection Using Parallel Deep Convolutional Models and Boosting Mechanism.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Towards Explainability in Deep Learning for Detection of Five Major Intracranial Hemorrhage Subtypes on Head CT Using Multi-window DICOM Imaging and Patient-Level Cross-Validation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Advanced multi-label brain hemorrhage segmentation using an attention-based residual U-Net model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Strategies to Improve the Robustness and Generalizability of Deep Learning Segmentation and Classification in Neuroimaging.BioMedInformatics · 2025Article
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Prognosis Classification via Joint-Attention Cross-Modal Network.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Intracranial hemorrhage detection in 3D computed tomography images using a bi-directional long short-term memory network-based modified genetic algorithm.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) can lead to death or disability, which requires immediate action from radiologists. Due to the heavy workload, less experienced staff, and the complexity of subtle hemorrhages, a more intelligent and automated system is necessary to detect ICH. In literature, many artificial-intelligence-based methods are proposed. However, they are less accurate for ICH detection and subtype classification. Therefore, in this paper, we present a new methodology to improve the detection and subtype classification of ICH based on two parallel paths and a boosting technique. The first path employs the architecture of ResNet101-V2 to extract potential features from windowed slices, whereas Inception-V4 captures significant spatial information in the second path. Afterwards, the detection and subtype classification of ICH is performed by the light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) using the outputs of ResNet101-V2 and Inception-V4. Thus, the combined solution, known as ResNet101-V2, Inception-V4, and LGBM (Res-Inc-LGBM), is trained and tested over the brain computed tomography (CT) scans of CQ500 and Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) datasets. The experimental results state that the proposed solution efficiently obtains 97.7% accuracy, 96.5% sensitivity, and 97.4% F1 score using the RSNA dataset. Moreover, the proposed Res-Inc-LGBM outperforms the standard benchmarks for the detection and subtype classification of ICH regarding the accuracy, sensitivity, and F1 score. The results prove the significance of the proposed solution for its real-time application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.