Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36832100›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Xinyu Hao, Dongying Zheng, Muhanmmad Khan, Lixia Wang, Timo Hämäläinen, Fengyu Cong, Hongming Xu, Kedong Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Systemic lupus erythematosus with high disease activity identification based on machine learning.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinyu HaoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Dongying ZhengState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian R&D Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-5013
Muhanmmad KhanInstitute of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore 54590, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-5509-3660
Lixia WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116027, China.
Timo HämäläinenFaculty of Information Technology, University of Jyvaskyla, 40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4168-9102
Fengyu CongSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Hongming XuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Kedong SongState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian R&D Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2185-1050

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities DUT21YG135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting adverse outcomes is essential for pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to minimize risks. Applying statistical analysis may be limited for the small sample size of childbearing patients, while the informative medical records could be provided. This study aimed to develop predictive models applying machine learning (ML) techniques to explore more information. We performed a retrospective analysis of 51 pregnant women exhibiting SLE, including 288 variables. After correlation analysis and feature selection, six ML models were applied to the filtered dataset. The efficiency of these overall models was evaluated by the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. Meanwhile, real-time models with different timespans based on gestation were also explored. Eighteen variables demonstrated statistical differences between the two groups; more than forty variables were screened out by ML variable selection strategies as contributing predictors, while the overlap of variables were the influential indicators testified by the two selection strategies. The Random Forest (RF) algorithm demonstrated the best discrimination ability under the current dataset for overall predictive models regardless of the data missing rate, while Multi-Layer Perceptron models ranked second. Meanwhile, RF achieved best performance when assessing the real-time predictive accuracy of models. ML models could compensate the limitation of statistical methods when the small sample size problem happens along with numerous variables acquired, while RF classifier performed relatively best when applied to such structured medical records.

Indexed as

gestationmachine learningpredictionpregnancyrandom forestSLEsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID36832100
PMCPMC9955045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.