ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: An Updated Systematic Review of Their Role in Obstetrics and Midwifery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
- Systemic lupus in the era of machine learning medicine.Lupus science & medicine · 2024Review
- Risk prediction model based on machine learning for predicting miscarriage among pregnant patients with immune abnormalities.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Systemic lupus erythematosus with high disease activity identification based on machine learning.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting adverse outcomes is essential for pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to minimize risks. Applying statistical analysis may be limited for the small sample size of childbearing patients, while the informative medical records could be provided. This study aimed to develop predictive models applying machine learning (ML) techniques to explore more information. We performed a retrospective analysis of 51 pregnant women exhibiting SLE, including 288 variables. After correlation analysis and feature selection, six ML models were applied to the filtered dataset. The efficiency of these overall models was evaluated by the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. Meanwhile, real-time models with different timespans based on gestation were also explored. Eighteen variables demonstrated statistical differences between the two groups; more than forty variables were screened out by ML variable selection strategies as contributing predictors, while the overlap of variables were the influential indicators testified by the two selection strategies. The Random Forest (RF) algorithm demonstrated the best discrimination ability under the current dataset for overall predictive models regardless of the data missing rate, while Multi-Layer Perceptron models ranked second. Meanwhile, RF achieved best performance when assessing the real-time predictive accuracy of models. ML models could compensate the limitation of statistical methods when the small sample size problem happens along with numerous variables acquired, while RF classifier performed relatively best when applied to such structured medical records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.