Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36832079›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Preanalytical Errors in a Hematology Laboratory: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.

Mohammad Shahid Iqbal, Aisha Tabassum, Ahmad Fawzi Arbaeen, Ahmed H Qasem, Adel G Elshemi, Hibah Almasmoum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad Shahid IqbalDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm al Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6683-409X
Aisha TabassumDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm al Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad Fawzi ArbaeenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm al Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed H QasemDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm al Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6681-5363
Adel G ElshemiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm al Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4772-8416
Hibah AlmasmoumDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm al Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1874-3422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaboratory errors arise at any stage of testing. Detecting these inaccuracies before results are revealed might delay diagnosis and treatment, causing patient distress. Here, we studied the preanalytical errors in a hematology laboratory.

methodsThis one-year retrospective analysis was conducted at the laboratory of a tertiary care hospital and included information on blood samples that were taken for hematology tests from both outpatients and inpatients. Laboratory records included sample collection and rejection information. The type and frequency of preanalytical errors were expressed as a proportion of total errors and sample number. Microsoft Excel was utilized to enter data. The results were presented in the form of frequency tables.

resultsThis research included 67,892 hematology samples. For preanalytical errors, 886 samples (1.3%) were discarded. The most common preanalytical error was insufficient sample (54.17%), and the least common was an empty/damaged tube (0.4%). Erroneous samples in the emergency department were mostly insufficient and clotted, whereas pediatric sample errors were caused by insufficient and diluted samples.

conclusionInadequate samples and clotted samples account for the vast majority of preanalytical factors. Insufficiency and dilutional errors were most frequent from pediatric patients. Adherence to best laboratory practices can drastically cut down on preanalytical errors.

Indexed as

hematologylaboratorypreanalytical errorquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID36832079
PMCPMC9955620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.