Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36832012›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2023

Recent Advances in Microfluidics-Based Electrochemical Sensors for Foodborne Pathogen Detection.

Madhusudan B Kulkarni, Narasimha H Ayachit, Tejraj M Aminabhavi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Emerging point-of-care technologies for bacterial pathogen detection.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026
    Review
  3. From conventional to biosensor-based detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Revolutionizing food safety with electrochemical biosensors for rapid and portable pathogen detection.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Multimodal Biosensing of Foodborne Pathogens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madhusudan B KulkarniRenalyx Healthcare Systems (P) Limited, Bengaluru 560004, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2911-3784
Narasimha H AyachitSchool of Advanced Sciences, KLE Technological University, Hubballi 580031, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5463-2586
Tejraj M AminabhaviSchool of Advanced Sciences, KLE Technological University, Hubballi 580031, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5613-3916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using pathogen-infected food that can be unhygienic can result in severe diseases and an increase in mortality rate among humans. This may arise as a serious emergency problem if not appropriately restricted at this point of time. Thus, food science researchers are concerned with precaution, prevention, perception, and immunity to pathogenic bacteria. Expensive, elongated assessment time and the need for skilled personnel are some of the shortcomings of the existing conventional methods. Developing and investigating a rapid, low-cost, handy, miniature, and effective detection technology for pathogens is indispensable. In recent times, there has been a significant scope of interest for microfluidics-based three-electrode potentiostat sensing platforms, which have been extensively used for sustainable food safety exploration because of their progressively high selectivity and sensitivity. Meticulously, scholars have made noteworthy revolutions in signal enrichment tactics, measurable devices, and portable tools, which can be used as an allusion to food safety investigation. Additionally, a device for this purpose must incorporate simplistic working conditions, automation, and miniaturization. In order to meet the critical needs of food safety for on-site detection of pathogens, point-of-care testing (POCT) has to be introduced and integrated with microfluidic technology and electrochemical biosensors. This review critically discusses the recent literature, classification, difficulties, applications, and future directions of microfluidics-based electrochemical sensors for screening and detecting foodborne pathogens.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesMicrofluidicsBacteriaElectrochemical TechniquesHumansPoint-of-Care Testingelectrochemicalfood safetymicrofluidicsnanotechnologypathogenssensors

Identifiers

PMID36832012
PMCPMC9954504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.