ArticleBiosensors2023
A Lightweight Deep Learning Based Microwave Brain Image Network Model for Brain Tumor Classification Using Reconstructed Microwave Brain (RMB) Images.
Article in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A compact and interpretable multi-source framework for heterogeneous medical image classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Interpretable deep learning model and nomogram for predicting pathological grading of PNETs based on endoscopic ultrasound.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Machine Learning in Microwave Medical Imaging and Lesion Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Breast Cancer Detection via Multi-Tiered Self-Contrastive Learning in Microwave Radiometric Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AG-MSTLN-EL: A Multi-source Transfer Learning Approach to Brain Tumor Detection.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Brain Tumour Detection Using VGG-Based Feature Extraction With Modified DarkNet-53 Model.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- A Multimodal Adaptive Inter-Region Attention-Guided Network for Brain Tumor Classification.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2025Article
- A Comparative Study of Decoders for Liver and Tumor Segmentation Using a Self-ONN-Based Cascaded Framework.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Employing Xception convolutional neural network through high-precision MRI analysis for brain tumor diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Deep Learning on MRI Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Analysis of Hybrid Feature Optimization Techniques Based on the Classification Accuracy of Brain Tumor Regions Using Machine Learning and Further Evaluation Based on the Institute Test Data.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computerized brain tumor classification from the reconstructed microwave brain (RMB) images is important for the examination and observation of the development of brain disease. In this paper, an eight-layered lightweight classifier model called microwave brain image network (MBINet) using a self-organized operational neural network (Self-ONN) is proposed to classify the reconstructed microwave brain (RMB) images into six classes. Initially, an experimental antenna sensor-based microwave brain imaging (SMBI) system was implemented, and RMB images were collected to create an image dataset. It consists of a total of 1320 images: 300 images for the non-tumor, 215 images for each single malignant and benign tumor, 200 images for each double benign tumor and double malignant tumor, and 190 images for the single benign and single malignant tumor classes. Then, image resizing and normalization techniques were used for image preprocessing. Thereafter, augmentation techniques were applied to the dataset to make 13,200 training images per fold for 5-fold cross-validation. The MBINet model was trained and achieved accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and specificity of 96.97%, 96.93%, 96.85%, 96.83%, and 97.95%, respectively, for six-class classification using original RMB images. The MBINet model was compared with four Self-ONNs, two vanilla CNNs, ResNet50, ResNet101, and DenseNet201 pre-trained models, and showed better classification outcomes (almost 98%). Therefore, the MBINet model can be used for reliably classifying the tumor(s) using RMB images in the SMBI system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.