Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831879›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Perceptual Contiguity Does Not Modulate Matched-Case Identity-Priming Effects in Lexical Decision.

Marta Vergara-Martínez, María Fernández-López, Manuel Perea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marta Vergara-MartínezInterdisciplinary Structure of Reading Research (ERI.-Lectura), Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1931-0335
María Fernández-LópezInterdisciplinary Structure of Reading Research (ERI.-Lectura), Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7419-7369
Manuel PereaInterdisciplinary Structure of Reading Research (ERI.-Lectura), Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3291-1365

Funding

Generalitat Valenciana CIAICO/2021/172Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation PID2020-116740 GB-I00 (funded by the MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent studies with the masked priming lexical decision task, matched-case identity-priming effects occur for nonwords but not for words (e.g., nonwords: ERTAR-ERTAR faster than ertar-ERTAR; words: ALTAR-ALTAR produces similar response times as altar-ALTAR). This dissociation is thought to result from lexical feedback influencing orthographic representations in word processing. As nonwords do not receive this feedback, bottom-up processing of prime-target integration leads to matched-case effects. However, the underlying mechanism of this effect in nonwords remains unclear. In this study, we added a color congruency manipulation across the prime and target in the matched-case identity-priming design. We aimed to determine whether the case effects originate at the early stages of prime-target perceptual integration or due to bottom-up activation of case-specific letter detectors. Results replicated the previous dissociation between words and nonwords regarding the matched-case identity effect. Additionally, we did not find any modulation of these effects by prime-target color congruency. These findings suggest that the locus of the matched-case identity effect is at an orthographic level of representation that encodes case information.

Indexed as

colorlexical decisionmasked primingorthographic processingword recognition

Identifiers

PMID36831879
PMCPMC9954145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.