Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831864›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

The Effect of Tactile Imagery Training on Reaction Time in Healthy Participants.

Kishor Lakshminarayanan, Vadivelan Ramu, Janaane Rajendran, Kamala Prasanna Chandrasekaran, Rakshit Shah, Sohail R Daulat, Viashen Moodley, Deepa Madathil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kishor LakshminarayananNeuro-Rehabilitation Lab, Department of Sensors and Biomedical Engineering, School of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4160-4129
Vadivelan RamuNeuro-Rehabilitation Lab, Department of Sensors and Biomedical Engineering, School of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Janaane RajendranNeuro-Rehabilitation Lab, Department of Sensors and Biomedical Engineering, School of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Kamala Prasanna ChandrasekaranNeuro-Rehabilitation Lab, Department of Sensors and Biomedical Engineering, School of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Rakshit ShahDepartment of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4297-1756
Sohail R DaulatUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-2879
Viashen MoodleyArizona Center for Hand to Shoulder Surgery, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Deepa MadathilJindal Institute of Behavioural Sciences, O. P. Jindal Global University, Haryana 131001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-901X
Vellore Institute of Technology University · INCleveland State University · USO. P. Jindal Global University · INUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Department of Science & Technology SRG/2021/000283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReaction time is an important measure of sensorimotor performance and coordination and has been shown to improve with training. Various training methods have been employed in the past to improve reaction time. Tactile imagery (TI) is a method of mentally simulating a tactile sensation and has been used in brain-computer interface applications. However, it is yet unknown whether TI can have a learning effect and improve reaction time.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of TI on reaction time in healthy participants.

methodsWe examined the reaction time to vibratory stimuli before and after a TI training session in an experimental group and compared the change in reaction time post-training with pre-training in the experimental group as well as the reaction time in a control group. A follow-up evaluation of reaction time was also conducted.

resultsThe results showed that TI training significantly improved reaction time after TI compared with before TI by approximately 25% (pre-TI right-hand mean ± SD: 456.62 ± 124.26 ms, pre-TI left-hand mean ± SD: 448.82 ± 124.50 ms, post-TI right-hand mean ± SD: 340.32 ± 65.59 ms, post-TI left-hand mean ± SD: 335.52 ± 59.01 ms). Furthermore, post-training reaction time showed significant reduction compared with the control group and the improved reaction time had a lasting effect even after four weeks post-training.

conclusionThese findings indicate that TI training may serve as an alternate imagery strategy for improving reaction time without the need for physical practice.

Indexed as

motor imageryreaction timetactile imagerytrainingvibration

Identifiers

PMID36831864
PMCPMC9954091
OpenAlexW4320729452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.