Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831816›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Transcutaneous Electrical Cranial-Auricular Acupoint Stimulation Modulating the Brain Functional Connectivity of Mild-to-Moderate Major Depressive Disorder: An fMRI Study Based on Independent Component Analysis.

Lifang Liao, Liulu Zhang, Jun Lv, Yingchun Liu, Jiliang Fang, Peijing Rong, Yong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lifang LiaoCollege of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6701-6635
Liulu ZhangDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Affiliated Chinese Traditional Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Jun LvDepartment of Comprehensive Internal Medicine, Affiliated Chinese Traditional Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Yingchun LiuDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Affiliated Chinese Traditional Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Jiliang FangGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Peijing RongInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100005, China.
Yong LiuDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Affiliated Chinese Traditional Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.

Funding

Beijing Medical Award Foundation YXJL-2022-0105-0142National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFC1705800Project of Sichuan Provincial of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2021MS424)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence has shown the roles of taVNS and TECS in improving depression but few studies have explored their synergistic effects on MDD. Therefore, the treatment responsivity and neurological effects of TECAS were investigated and compared to escitalopram, a commonly used medication for depression. Fifty patients with mild-to-moderate MDD (29 in the TECAS group and 21 in another) and 49 demographically matched healthy controls were recruited. After an eight-week treatment, the outcomes of TECAS and escitalopram were evaluated by the effective rate and reduction rate based on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. Altered brain networks were analyzed between pre- and post-treatment using independent component analysis. There was no significant difference in clinical scales between TECAS and escitalopram but these were significantly decreased after each treatment. Both treatments modulated connectivity of the default mode network (DMN), dorsal attention network (DAN), right frontoparietal network (RFPN), and primary visual network (PVN), and the decreased PVN-RFPN connectivity might be the common brain mechanism. However, there was increased DMN-RFPN and DMN-DAN connectivity after TECAS, while it decreased in escitalopram. In conclusion, TECAS could relieve symptoms of depression similarly to escitalopram but induces different changes in brain networks.

Indexed as

depressionescitalopramindependent component analysis (ICA)MRIresting-state functional magnetic resonance imagingtranscutaneous electrical cranial-auricular acupoint stimulation (TECAS)

Identifiers

PMID36831816
PMCPMC9953795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.