Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831811›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Convolutional Neural Network with a Topographic Representation Module for EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Xinbin Liang, Yaru Liu, Yang Yu, Kaixuan Liu, Yadong Liu, Zongtan Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinbin LiangCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9910-6152
Yaru LiuCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Yang YuCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Kaixuan LiuCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Yadong LiuCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Zongtan ZhouCollege of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.

Funding

Defense Industrial Technology Development Program JCKY2020550B003joint funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China U19A2083National Natural Science Foundation of China 61722313National Natural Science Foundation of China 62006239National Natural Science Foundation of China 62036013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown great potential in the field of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) due to their ability to directly process raw electroencephalogram (EEG) signals without artificial feature extraction. Some CNNs have achieved better classification accuracy than that of traditional methods. Raw EEG signals are usually represented as a two-dimensional (2-D) matrix composed of channels and time points, ignoring the spatial topological information of electrodes. Our goal is to make a CNN that takes raw EEG signals as inputs have the ability to learn spatial topological features and improve its classification performance while basically maintaining its original structure. We propose an EEG topographic representation module (TRM). This module consists of (1) a mapping block from raw EEG signals to a 3-D topographic map and (2) a convolution block from the topographic map to an output with the same size as the input. According to the size of the convolutional kernel used in the convolution block, we design two types of TRMs, namely TRM-(5,5) and TRM-(3,3). We embed the two TRM types into three widely used CNNs (ShallowConvNet, DeepConvNet and EEGNet) and test them on two publicly available datasets (the Emergency Braking During Simulated Driving Dataset (EBDSDD) and the High Gamma Dataset (HGD)). Results show that the classification accuracies of all three CNNs are improved on both datasets after using the TRMs. With TRM-(5,5), the average classification accuracies of DeepConvNet, EEGNet and ShallowConvNet are improved by 6.54%, 1.72% and 2.07% on the EBDSDD and by 6.05%, 3.02% and 5.14% on the HGD, respectively; with TRM-(3,3), they are improved by 7.76%, 1.71% and 2.17% on the EBDSDD and by 7.61%, 5.06% and 6.28% on the HGD, respectively. We improve the classification performance of three CNNs on both datasets through the use of TRMs, indicating that they have the capability to mine spatial topological EEG information. More importantly, since the output of a TRM has the same size as the input, CNNs with raw EEG signals as inputs can use this module without changing their original structures.

Indexed as

brain–computer interface (BCI)convolutional neural network (CNN)deep learningEEG decodingelectroencephalogram (EEG)topographic representation

Identifiers

PMID36831811
PMCPMC9954538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.