Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831747›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Differences of Modality Use between Telepractice and Face-to-Face Administration of the Scenario-Test in Persons with Dementia-Related Speech Disorder.

Mirjam Gauch, Sabine Corsten, Katharina Geschke, Isabel Heinrich, Juliane Leinweber, Bianca Spelter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mirjam GauchDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Sabine CorstenFaculty of Healthcare and Nursing, Catholic University of Applied Sciences Mainz, 55122 Mainz, Germany.
Katharina GeschkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7311-0049
Isabel HeinrichDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Juliane LeinweberFaculty of Engineering and Health, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen, Health Campus Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Bianca SpelterFaculty of Engineering and Health, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen, Health Campus Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9490-6852
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences Mainz · DE

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01IS19039C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telepractice is increasingly finding its way into the care of people with dementia. Web-based delivery of speech and language therapy (SLT) is feasible and has the potential to improve communication in people with dementia-related speech disorders. Although experts are discussing the strengths and weaknesses of telepractice, a precise analysis of the differences between analogue and digital communication for this heterogeneous group of patients is still missing. The three current single cases investigated verbal and nonverbal aspects of communication in a face-to-face (F2F) and digital setting through a qualitative research design. Using the scenario-test (ST) in person and via big blue button (BBB; video conferencing system), several decisive factors were detected, influencing the effectiveness of communication in a F2F compared to a digital setting. The most important results of the qualitative content analysis are described for each case individually. Additionally, the influence of person-related factors, such as age, diagnosis, presence of depression, and level of education, is presented. Perceptual, executive, and affective disorders, as well as aids of relatives, are considered separately. The results indicate that executive functions, affects, and perceptual deficits need to be taken into account if telepractice is to be applied. Age, education, and distinct forms of dementia might be decisive for successful telepractice as well.

Indexed as

modality useprimary progressive aphasiatelepractice

Identifiers

PMID36831747
PMCPMC9954369
OpenAlexW4318052362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.