ArticleBrain sciences2023
Changes in ImPACT Cognitive Subtest Networks Following Sport-Related Concussion.
Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the acute trajectory of sport-related concussion outcomes across symptoms, cognition, and blood biomarkers.Sports medicine and health science · 2026Review
- A Guide to the Interpretation and Reliability of Annual Collegiate ImPACT Baselines by Sex.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026Article
- Concussions in Portuguese Professional Football: A Preliminary Epidemiological Study.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Minimal Detectable Change for the ImPACT Subtests at Baseline.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2024Article
- Network analysis of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Article
- Network Analysis of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Alzheimer's Disease.Research square · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHigh school athletes are administered ImPACT at the start of the academic year or sport season and again after suspected concussion. Concussion management involves the comparison of baseline and post-injury cognitive scores with declines in scores providing evidence for concussive injury. A network framework may provide additional information about post-concussive cognitive changes and expand characterization of sport-related concussion (SRC) recovery.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingHigh school.
participantsHigh school athletes ( INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: ImPACT cognitive subtest scores.
main outcome measuresCognitive networks were calculated and compared over three time points. Centrality indices were calculated to determine the relative importance of cognitive variables within networks.
resultsNetwork connectivity increased from T1 to T2 and remained hyperconnected at T3. There was evidence of network reorganization between T1 and T3. Processing speed was central within each network, and visual memory and impulsivity became more central over time.
conclusionsThe results suggest potential evidence of cognitive network change over time. Centrality findings suggest research specific to visual memory and impulse control difficulties during the post-concussion recovery period is warranted. Network analysis may provide additional information about cognitive recovery following SRC and could potentially serve as an effective means of monitoring persisting cognitive symptoms after concussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.