Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831647›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

CDK4/6 Inhibitors Overcome Endocrine ESR1 Mutation-Related Resistance in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.

Stefania Crucitta, Martina Ruglioni, Giulia Lorenzini, Irene Bargagna, Giovanna Irene Luculli, Irene Albanese, Diana Bilancio, Francesca Patanè, Andrea Fontana, Romano Danesi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Cancers · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Multiplex detection of tenThe journal of liquid biopsy · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stefania CrucittaUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Martina RuglioniUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Giulia LorenziniUnit of Medical Oncology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Irene BargagnaUnit of Medical Oncology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Giovanna Irene LuculliUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Irene AlbaneseUnit of Medical Oncology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Diana BilancioUnit of Medical Oncology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Francesca PatanèUnit of Medical Oncology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Andrea FontanaUnit of Medical Oncology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2496-2506
Romano DanesiUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4414-8934
Marzia Del ReUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7343-6161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ESR1 mutations contribute to endocrine resistance and occur in a high percentage of hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) cases. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) changed the treatment landscape of HR+ mBC, as they are able to overcome estrogen resistance. The present retrospective study investigates the clinical benefit of CDK4/6i in ESR1 mutant HR+ mBC patients treated with a CDK4/6i as first- or second-line therapy. Plasma was collected at baseline prior to CDK4/6i plus hormone therapy as a first- or second-line treatment. Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted from plasma, and ESR1 mutation analysis was performed on a ddPCR. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate the predictive power of ESR1 mutations and any association with clinical factors. A total of 42 patients with mBC treated with CDK4/6i plus endocrine therapy as first- (

Indexed as

CDK4/6 inhibitorctDNAESR1 mutationliquid biopsymetastatic breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID36831647
PMCPMC9954458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.