ReviewCancers2023
Endoscopic Ultrasound Advanced Techniques for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours.
Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Diagnosis and Management of Asymptomatic Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026Guideline
- A novel risk-scoring system based on endoscopic ultrasound and clinical characteristics for the preoperative diagnosis of small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Multi-Slice Spiral CT in Diagnosing Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) in Gastric Cancer: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy and influencing factors of microprobe endoscopic ultrasound for gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- An artificial intelligence model utilizing endoscopic ultrasonography for differentiating small and micro gastric stromal tumors from gastric leiomyomas.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- A Lightweight Machine Learning Model for High Precision Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Identification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Application of AI in the identification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive analysis based on pathological, radiological, and genetic variation features.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Endoscopic Ultrasound and Gastric Sub-Epithelial Lesions: Ultrasonographic Features, Tissue Acquisition Strategies, and Therapeutic Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Moderate Sedation or Deep Sedation for ERCP: What Are the Preferences in the Literature?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- EUS-Guided Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Lesions, What Is New?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A new classification of gastric submucosal tumors under EUS based on blood flow signals.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
- Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) are subepithelial lesions (SELs) that commonly develop in the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs, unlike other SELs, can exhibit malignant behavior, so differential diagnosis is critical to the decision-making process. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered the most accurate imaging method for diagnosing and differentiating SELs in the gastrointestinal tract by assessing the lesions precisely and evaluating their malignant risk. Due to their overlapping imaging characteristics, endosonographers may have difficulty distinguishing GISTs from other SELs using conventional EUS alone, and the collection of tissue samples from these lesions may be technically challenging. Even though it appears to be less effective in the case of smaller lesions, histology is now the gold standard for achieving a final diagnosis and avoiding unnecessary and invasive treatment for benign SELs. The use of enhanced EUS modalities and elastography has improved the diagnostic ability of EUS. Furthermore, recent advancements in artificial intelligence systems that use EUS images have allowed them to distinguish GISTs from other SELs, thereby improving their diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.