Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831622›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Micro-Ultrasound: Current Role in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Future Possibilities.

Adriano Basso Dias, Sangeet Ghai

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07386171 (Evaluating Micro-Ultrasound as a Supplemental Imaging Modality for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection in Men With Negative or Stable Multiparametric MRI on Active Surveillance or at Diagnosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07386171 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Micro-Ultrasound as a Supplemental Imaging Modality for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection in Men With Negative or Stable Multiparametric MRI on Active Surveillance or at Diagnosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreRan2026 to 2027Enrolled90ConditionsProstate Cancer, Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer, Imaging TechniquesArmsMicro-Ultrasound (mUS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. BJUI compass · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Microultrasound imaging for accuracy of diagnosis in prostate cancer: a single‑center observational study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adriano Basso DiasJoint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mt Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Sangeet GhaiJoint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mt Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9451-0594
University Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate Cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men. Population screening using prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test and digital rectal exam (DRE) is recommended by the NCCN, EAU and other prominent clinical guidelines. While MRI is the recommended initial test in men at risk for PCa, micro-Ultrasound (MicroUS) is a novel high resolution ultrasound technology that has shown promise in PCa detection. This article provides a narrative review of the studies to date which have been conducted to evaluate the functionality and efficacy of MicroUS within the patient care pathway for prostate cancer. A total of 13 relevant publications comparing detection of csPCa between MicroUS and mpMRI were selected. An amount of 4 publications referring to use of MicroUS for other indications were found. Each publication was evaluated for risk of bias and applicability using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tool. The studies reviewed conclude that MicroUS detection rates for clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis are comparable to the detection rates of mpMRI guided biopsy procedures. While the existing literature indicates that MicroUS should replace conventional TRUS for prostate imaging and biopsy, it is not yet clear whether MicroUS should be used on its own or in conjunction with mpMRI for augmenting prostate cancer detection. The ongoing OPTIMUM trial will provide evidence on how best to utilize this new technology. Early data also suggest this flexible new imaging modality has a place in local staging and active surveillance of prostate cancer as well as in bladder cancer staging.

Indexed as

cancer detectioncomparisonmicro-ultrasoundmpMRIprostate cancerreview

Identifiers

PMID36831622
PMCPMC9954149
OpenAlexW4321253077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.