Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831599›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Improving Automatic Melanoma Diagnosis Using Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Irregular Networks.

Anand K Nambisan, Akanksha Maurya, Norsang Lama, Thanh Phan, Gehana Patel, Keith Miller, Binita Lama, Jason Hagerty, Ronald Stanley, William V Stoecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A novel deep learning framework for accurate melanoma diagnosis integrating imaging and genomic data for improved patient outcomes.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anand K NambisanElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.
Akanksha MauryaElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.
Norsang LamaElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.
Thanh PhanDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Arts, Sciences, and Education, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.
Gehana PatelCollege of Health Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Keith MillerElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.
Binita LamaElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.
Jason HagertyS&A Technologies, 10101 Stoltz Drive, Rolla, MO 65401, USA.
Ronald StanleyElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA.
William V StoeckerS&A Technologies, 10101 Stoltz Drive, Rolla, MO 65401, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has achieved significant success in malignant melanoma diagnosis. These diagnostic models are undergoing a transition into clinical use. However, with melanoma diagnostic accuracy in the range of ninety percent, a significant minority of melanomas are missed by deep learning. Many of the melanomas missed have irregular pigment networks visible using dermoscopy. This research presents an annotated irregular network database and develops a classification pipeline that fuses deep learning image-level results with conventional hand-crafted features from irregular pigment networks. We identified and annotated 487 unique dermoscopic melanoma lesions from images in the ISIC 2019 dermoscopic dataset to create a ground-truth irregular pigment network dataset. We trained multiple transfer learned segmentation models to detect irregular networks in this training set. A separate, mutually exclusive subset of the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) 2019 dataset with 500 melanomas and 500 benign lesions was used for training and testing deep learning models for the binary classification of melanoma versus benign. The best segmentation model, U-Net++, generated irregular network masks on the 1000-image dataset. Other classical color, texture, and shape features were calculated for the irregular network areas. We achieved an increase in the recall of melanoma versus benign of 11% and in accuracy of 2% over DL-only models using conventional classifiers in a sequential pipeline based on the cascade generalization framework, with the highest increase in recall accompanying the use of the random forest algorithm. The proposed approach facilitates leveraging the strengths of both deep learning and conventional image processing techniques to improve the accuracy of melanoma diagnosis. Further research combining deep learning with conventional image processing on automatically detected dermoscopic features is warranted.

Indexed as

angulated linesatypical networkbranch streakscascade generalizationdeep learningfusionmachine learningmelanoma

Identifiers

PMID36831599
PMCPMC9953766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.