Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831557›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

A Systematic Review on the Potential Acceleration of Neurocognitive Aging in Older Cancer Survivors.

Charlotte Kerstens, Hans P M W Wildiers, Gwen Schroyen, Mercedes Almela, Ruth E Mark, Maarten Lambrecht, Sabine Deprez, Charlotte Sleurs

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Galectin-9Aging cell · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Health-related quality of life and lifestyle in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer and a matched non-cancer reference group.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Preparing for and Not Waiting for Surgery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte KerstensDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Hans P M W WildiersLeuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8990-7837
Gwen SchroyenLeuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9646-5106
Mercedes AlmelaDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, 5030AB Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Ruth E MarkDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, 5030AB Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Maarten LambrechtLeuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Sabine DeprezLeuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7451-5355
Charlotte SleursLeuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Tilburg University · NLKU Leuven · BEVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As survival rates increase, more emphasis has gone to possible cognitive sequelae in older cancer patients, which could be explained by accelerated brain aging. In this review, we provide a complete overview of studies investigating neuroimaging, neurocognitive, and neurodegenerative disorders in older cancer survivors (>65 years), based on three databases (Pubmed, Web of Science and Medline). Ninety-six studies were included. Evidence was found for functional and structural brain changes (frontal regions, basal ganglia, gray and white matter), compared to healthy controls. Cognitive decline was mainly found in memory functioning. Anti-hormonal treatments were repeatedly associated with cognitive decline (tamoxifen) and sometimes with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (androgen deprivation therapy). Chemotherapy was inconsistently associated with later development of cognitive changes or dementia. Radiotherapy was not associated with cognition in patients with non-central nervous system cancer but can play a role in patients with central nervous system cancer, while neurosurgery seemed to improve their cognition in the short-term. Individual risk factors included cancer subtypes (e.g., brain cancer, hormone-related cancers), treatment (e.g., anti-hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, cranial radiation), genetic predisposition (e.g., APOE, COMT, BDNF), age, comorbidities (e.g., frailty, cognitive reserve), and psychological (e.g., depression, (post-traumatic) distress, sleep, fatigue) and social factors (e.g., loneliness, limited caregiver support, low SES). More research on accelerated aging is required to guide intervention studies.

Indexed as

agingcancer survivorscognitionneurodegenerationolder

Identifiers

PMID36831557
PMCPMC9954467
OpenAlexW4320920744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.