Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831528›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

LC-MS/MS Based Volatile Organic Compound Biomarkers Analysis for Early Detection of Lung Cancer.

Shuaibu Nazifi Sani, Wei Zhou, Balarabe B Ismail, Yongkui Zhang, Zhijun Chen, Binjie Zhang, Changqian Bao, Houde Zhang, Xiaozhi Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review: Detection of Cancer Biomarkers from a Clinical Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. RSC advances · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shuaibu Nazifi SaniCollege of Information Science & Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Wei ZhouBiochemical Analysis Laboratory, Breath (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310000, China.
Balarabe B IsmailCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0153-4333
Yongkui ZhangZhejiang Zhoushan Hospital, Zhoushan 316021, China.
Zhijun ChenZhejiang Zhoushan Hospital, Zhoushan 316021, China.
Binjie ZhangZhejiang Zhoushan Hospital, Zhoushan 316021, China.
Changqian BaoDepartment of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China.
Houde ZhangDepartment Gastroenterology, Nanshan Hospital, Guandong Medical University, Shenzhen 518052, China.
Xiaozhi WangCollege of Information Science & Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
Zhejiang University · CNZhoushan Hospital · CNAnshan Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: lung cancer is the world's deadliest cancer, but early diagnosis helps to improve the cure rate and thus reduce the mortality rate. Annual low-dose computed tomography (LD-CT) screening is an efficient lung cancer-screening program for a high-risk population. However, LD-CT has often been characterized by a higher degree of false-positive results. To meet these challenges, a volatolomic approach, in particular, the breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) fingerprint analysis, has recently received increased attention for its application in early lung cancer screening thanks to its convenience, non-invasiveness, and being well tolerated by patients. (2) Methods: a LC-MS/MS-based volatolomics analysis was carried out according to P/N 5046800 standard based breath analysis of VOC as novel cancer biomarkers for distinguishing early-stage lung cancer from the healthy control group. The discriminatory accuracy of identified VOCs was assessed using subject work characterization and a random forest risk prediction model. (3) Results: the proposed technique has good performance compared with existing approaches, the differences between the exhaled VOCs of the early lung cancer patients before operation, three to seven days after the operation, as well as four to six weeks after operation under fasting and 1 h after the meal were compared with the healthy controls. The results showed that only 1 h after a meal, the concentration of seven VOCs, including 3-hydroxy-2-butanone (TG-4), glycolaldehyde (TG-7), 2-pentanone (TG-8), acrolein (TG-11), nonaldehyde (TG-19), decanal (TG-20), and crotonaldehyde (TG-22), differ significantly between lung cancer patients and control, with the invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung (IAC) having the most significant difference. (4) Conclusions: this novel, non-invasive approach can improve the detection rate of early lung cancer, and LC-MS/MS-based breath analysis could be a promising method for clinical application.

Indexed as

biomarker analysisearly screeningexhaled breathLC-MS/MS analysislung cancervolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID36831528
PMCPMC9954752
OpenAlexW4320491327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.