Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831524›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted versus Systematic Prostate Biopsy; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Vladislav Petov, Camilla Azilgareeva, Anastasia Shpikina, Andrey Morozov, German Krupinov, Vasiliy Kozlov, Nirmish Singla, Juan Gómez Rivas, Moreno-Sierra Jesús, Stefano Puliatti and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Towards Design and Development of an MRI Conditional Robot to Enable Curvilinear Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The effectiveness of mapping-targeted biopsies on the index lesion in transperineal prostate biopsies.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Vladislav PetovInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Camilla AzilgareevaInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Anastasia ShpikinaInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey MorozovInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
German KrupinovInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Vasiliy KozlovDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Nirmish SinglaDepartments of Urology and Oncology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Juan Gómez RivasDepartment of Urology, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0556-3035
Moreno-Sierra JesúsDepartment of Urology, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6837-7718
Stefano PuliattiYoung Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Group in Urotechnology of the European Association of Urology, 30016 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1597-9595
Enrico CheccucciYoung Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Group in Urotechnology of the European Association of Urology, 30016 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Severin RodlerYoung Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Group in Urotechnology of the European Association of Urology, 30016 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7600-6535
Ines Rivero BelenchonYoung Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Group in Urotechnology of the European Association of Urology, 30016 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Karl-Friedrich KowalewskiYoung Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Group in Urotechnology of the European Association of Urology, 30016 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Alessandro VecciaYoung Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Group in Urotechnology of the European Association of Urology, 30016 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Jonathan McfarlandInstitute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Sechenov University, 123242 Moscow, Russia.
Giovanni E CacciamaniYoung Academic Urologists (YAU) Working Group in Urotechnology of the European Association of Urology, 30016 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8892-5539
Mark TaratkinInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4369-173X
Dmitry EnikeevInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRobot-assisted devices have been recently developed for use in prostate biopsy. However, it is possible advantages over standard biopsy remain unclear. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance and safety of robot-assisted targeted (RA-TB) and systematic prostate biopsies (RA-SB).

methodsA systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The detailed search strategy is available at Prospero (CRD42021269290). The primary outcome was the clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate. The secondary outcomes included the overall detection rate of PCa, cancer detection rate per core, and complications.

resultsThe clinically significant cancer detection rate, overall cancer detection rate, and "per patient" did not significantly differ between RA-TB and RA-SB [OR = 1.02 (95% CI 0.83; 1.26),

conclusionRA-TB and RA-SB are both technically feasible and have comparable clinical significance and overall PCa detection rates.

Indexed as

meta-analysisMR-targeted biopsyprostate cancerrobot-assisted prostate biopsysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36831524
PMCPMC9954527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.