Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831508›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Mass Spectrometry-Based Biomarkers to Detect Prostate Cancer: A Multicentric Study Based on Non-Invasive Urine Collection without Prior Digital Rectal Examination.

Maria Frantzi, Zoran Culig, Isabel Heidegger, Marika Mokou, Agnieszka Latosinska, Marie C Roesch, Axel S Merseburger, Manousos Makridakis, Antonia Vlahou, Ana Blanca-Pedregosa and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Maria FrantziDepartment of Biomarker Research, Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, 30659 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0415-0316
Zoran CuligExperimental Urology Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Isabel HeideggerExperimental Urology Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1517-5746
Marika MokouDepartment of Biomarker Research, Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, 30659 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4511-1578
Agnieszka LatosinskaDepartment of Biomarker Research, Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, 30659 Hannover, Germany.
Marie C RoeschDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Axel S MerseburgerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Manousos MakridakisSystems Biology Center, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0063-3559
Antonia VlahouSystems Biology Center, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3284-5713
Ana Blanca-PedregosaMaimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba, Department of Urology, University of Cordoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4360-4352
Julia Carrasco-ValienteMaimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba, Department of Urology, University of Cordoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.
Harald MischakDepartment of Biomarker Research, Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, 30659 Hannover, Germany.
Enrique Gomez-GomezMaimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba, Department of Urology, University of Cordoba, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.
Mosaiques Diagnostics and Therapeutics (Germany) · DEUniversity of Córdoba · ESAcademy of Athens · GRInnsbruck Medical University · ATUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research BioGuidePCa (E! 11023, Eurostars)Spanish ICSIII grant and the European Social Funds (FSE) PI22/01769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men. Wide application of prostate specific antigen test has historically led to over-treatment, starting from excessive biopsies. Risk calculators based on molecular and clinical variables can be of value to determine the risk of PCa and as such, reduce unnecessary and invasive biopsies. Urinary molecular studies have been mostly focusing on sampling after initial intervention (digital rectal examination and/or prostate massage). (2) Methods: Building on previous proteomics studies, in this manuscript, we aimed at developing a biomarker model for PCa detection based on urine sampling without prior intervention. Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry was applied to acquire proteomics profiles from 970 patients from two different clinical centers. (3) Results: A case-control comparison was performed in a training set of 413 patients and 181 significant peptides were subsequently combined by a support vector machine algorithm. Independent validation was initially performed in 272 negative for PCa and 138 biopsy-confirmed PCa, resulting in an AUC of 0.81, outperforming current standards, while a second validation phase included 147 PCa patients. (4) Conclusions: This multi-dimensional biomarker model holds promise to improve the current diagnosis of PCa, by guiding invasive biopsies.

Indexed as

biomarkersmachine learningomicsprostate cancerproteomicsurine

Identifiers

PMID36831508
PMCPMC9954607
OpenAlexW4320494336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.