ArticleCancers2023
Estimation of ALU Repetitive Elements in Plasma as a Cost-Effective Liquid Biopsy Tool for Disease Prognosis in Breast Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Quantification and Integrity in Breast Cancer Using Fluorometric, Electrophoretic and PCR-Based Platforms.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Circulating Cell-Free DNA Integrity for Breast and Prostate Cancer: What Is the Landscape for Clinical Management of the Most Common Cancers in Women and Men?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Measuring cfDNA integrity as a biomarker for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer patients: a pilot study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- A Case-Control Study by ddPCR of ALU 260/111 and LINE-1 266/97 Copy Number Ratio in Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Plasma Revealed LINE-1 266/97 as a Potential Biomarker for Early Breast Cancer Detection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLiquid biopsy is widely recognized as an efficient diagnostic method in oncology for disease detection and monitoring. Though the examination of circulating tumor cells (CTC) is mostly implemented for the assessment of genomic aberrations, the need of complex methodologies for their detection has impeded its acceptance in low-resource settings. We evaluated cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a liquid biopsy tool and investigated its utility in breast cancer patients.
methodsTotal cell-free DNA was extracted from the plasma of breast cancer patients (n = 167) with a median follow-up of more than 5 years, at various stages of the disease. Quantitative PCR was performed to estimate the copy numbers of two fractions of ALU repetitive elements (ALU 115 and ALU 247), and DNA integrity (DI) was calculated as the ratio of ALU 247/115. Mutations in TP53 and PIK3CA in the cfDNA were estimated by next-gen sequencing (NGS) in a subset of samples. Associations of the levels of both the ALU fragments with various clinico-pathological factors and disease-free survival at various stages were examined. Nomogram models were constructed with clinical variables and ALU 247 levels to predict disease-free survival and the best performing model was evaluated by decision curve analysis.
resultsDI and ALU 247 levels were significantly lower (
conclusionOur results confirm the utility of cfDNA as an evolving liquid biopsy tool for molecular analysis. Evaluation of larger fragments of cfDNA estimated through ALU 247 can provide vital information concurrent with the pathological process of disease evolution in breast cancer and warrants expansion to other cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.