ArticleCancers2023
Bevacizumab as Single Agent in Children and Teenagers with Optic Pathway Glioma.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of Bevacizumab-based treatments in Optic Pathway Glioma among pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Radiographic and visual response to the type II RAF inhibitor tovorafenib in children with relapsed/refractory optic pathway glioma in the FIREFLY-1 trial.Neuro-oncology · 2025Trial
- Bevacizumab in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- The state of targeted therapeutic pharmacological approaches in pediatric neurosurgery: report from the European Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery (ESPN) Consensus Conference 2024.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Suprasellar pure germinoma mimicking low-grade glioma on neuroimaging.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This is a retrospective study conducted on patients with OPG, aged less than 19 years, treated with bevacizumab as a single agent, since 2010 at IHOPe (Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology). Efficacy of the treatment was evaluated on the tumor response rate on MRI with a centralized review basing upon RAPNO criteria and with visual assessment basing upon a 0.2 log change in the logMAR scale. Thirty-one patients with OPG have been included. From a radiological point of view, best anytime responses were: 1 major response, 6 partial responses, 7 minor responses and 14 stable diseases; achieving disease control in 28 (96%) out of 29 patients. Ophthalmological response was evaluated in 25 patients and disease control was achieved in 22 (88%) out of 25, with 14 steady states and 8 significant improvements. Among patients treated with chemotherapy after the bevacizumab course, nine relapsed and have been retreated with objective responses. Bevacizumab used as single agent seems effective in children and adolescents with OPG. Our work paves the way for a phase II study in which bevacizumab alone could be used as frontline therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.