Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831271›Full record

ReviewCells2023

Surgical Models of Liver Regeneration in Pigs: A Practical Review of the Literature for Researchers.

Lorenzo Cinelli, Edoardo Maria Muttillo, Emanuele Felli, Andrea Baiocchini, Fabio Giannone, Jacques Marescaux, Didier Mutter, Michel De Mathelin, Sylvain Gioux, Eric Felli and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Experimental model of small-for-size syndrome in pigs.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Lorenzo CinelliDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2186-9421
Edoardo Maria MuttilloDivision of General Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3562-0392
Emanuele FelliService Chirurgie Digestive et Transplantation Hépatique, Hôpital Trousseau CHU, 37170 Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6510-1457
Andrea BaiocchiniDepartment of Pathology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Fabio GiannoneDigestive and Endocrine Surgery, Nouvel Hopital Civil, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Jacques MarescauxResearch Institute against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Didier MutterDigestive and Endocrine Surgery, Nouvel Hopital Civil, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Michel De MathelinICube Laboratory, Photonics Instrumentation for Health, 67400 Strasbourg, France.
Sylvain GiouxICube Laboratory, Photonics Instrumentation for Health, 67400 Strasbourg, France.
Eric FelliDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5664-6746
Michele DianaResearch Institute against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Ingénieur, de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie · FRInstitut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif · FRUniversity of Bern · CHCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITHôpital Civil, Strasbourg · FRSapienza University of Rome · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The remarkable capacity of regeneration of the liver is well known, although the involved mechanisms are far from being understood. Furthermore, limits concerning the residual functional mass of the liver remain critical in both fields of hepatic resection and transplantation. The aim of the present study was to review the surgical experiments regarding liver regeneration in pigs to promote experimental methodological standardization. The Pubmed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Studies evaluating liver regeneration through surgical experiments performed on pigs were included. A total of 139 titles were screened, and 41 articles were included in the study, with 689 pigs in total. A total of 29 studies (71% of all) had a survival design, with an average study duration of 13 days. Overall, 36 studies (88%) considered partial hepatectomy, of which four were an associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). Remnant liver volume ranged from 10% to 60%. Only 2 studies considered a hepatotoxic pre-treatment, while 25 studies evaluated additional liver procedures, such as stem cell application, ischemia/reperfusion injury, portal vein modulation, liver scaffold application, bio-artificial, and pharmacological liver treatment. Only nine authors analysed how cytokines and growth factors changed in response to liver resection. The most used imaging system to evaluate liver volume was CT-scan volumetry, even if performed only by nine authors. The pig represents one of the best animal models for the study of liver regeneration. However, it remains a mostly unexplored field due to the lack of experiments reproducing the chronic pathological aspects of the liver and the heterogeneity of existing studies.

Indexed as

LiverLiver RegenerationAnimalsHepatectomyModels, AnatomicPortal VeinSwinehepatotoxicityliver diseasesliver injuryliver regenerationliver repair

Identifiers

PMID36831271
PMCPMC9954688
OpenAlexW4320491923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.