ArticleBiomedicines2023
Primary Cutaneous Multifocal Indolent CD8+ T-Cell Lymphoma: A Novel Primary Cutaneous CD8+ T-Cell Lymphoma.
Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifocal primary cutaneous acral CD8JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- Review
- The enigmatic ear: Unveiling a rare case of a primary cutaneous CD8+ acral T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with a literature review.Rare tumors · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the case of a patient who was referred to our institution with a diagnosis of CD4+ small/medium-sized pleomorphic lymphoma. At the time, the patient showed a plethora of lesions mainly localizing to the legs; thus, we undertook studies to investigate the lineage and immunophenotype of the neoplastic clone. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed marked CD4 and CD8 positivity. Flow cytometry (FCM) showed two distinct T-cell populations, CD4+ and CD8+ (+/- PD1), with no CD4/CD8 co-expression and no loss of panT-cell markers in either T-cell subset. FCM, accompanied by cell-sorting (CS), permitted the physical separation of four populations, as follows: CD4+/PD1-, CD4+/PD1+, CD8+/PD1- and CD8+/PD1+. TCR gene rearrangement studies on each of the four populations (by next generation sequencing, NGS) showed that the neoplastic population was of T-cytotoxic cell lineage. IHC showed the CD8+ population to be TIA-1+, but perforin- and granzyme-negative. Moreover, histiocytic markers did not render the peculiar staining pattern, which is characteristic of acral CD8+ T-cell lymphoma (PCACD8). Compared to the entities described in the 2018 update of the WHO-EORTC classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas, we found that the indolent lymphoma described herein differed from all of them. We submit that this case represents a hitherto-undescribed type of CTCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.