Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36831144›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Transcriptomic Analysis of Macrophage Polarization Protocols: Vitamin D

Maria Rynikova, Petra Adamkova, Petra Hradicka, Jana Stofilova, Denisa Harvanova, Jana Matejova, Vlasta Demeckova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The M1/M2 Test System for Determining Macrophage Phenotypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Inhibition of the HFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria RynikovaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, 041 54 Kosice, Slovakia.
Petra AdamkovaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, 041 54 Kosice, Slovakia.
Petra HradickaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, 041 54 Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-6983-5792
Jana StofilovaCenter of Clinical and Preclinical Research MEDIPARK, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, 040 11 Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-9409-4153
Denisa HarvanovaAssociated Tissue Bank, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, 040 11 Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-3038-7520
Jana MatejovaAssociated Tissue Bank, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, 040 11 Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-9086-3621
Vlasta DemeckovaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, 041 54 Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-8244-6740
University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SKUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Open scientific community for modern interdisciplinary research in medicine (OPENMED) ITMS2014+: 313011V455Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic VEGA 1/0393/20The internal scientific grant of Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Slovak Republic vvgs-2022-2195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two main types of macrophages (Mφ) include inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophages. These cells can be obtained in vitro by polarization of monocytic cell lines using various stimuli. Since there is currently no consensus on the best method for the acquisition of reliable M1 and M2 macrophages from the THP-1 cell line, we decided to compare three different polarization protocols at the transcriptomic level. Whole transcriptomes of Mφ polarized according to the chosen protocols were analyzed using RNA-seq. Differential expression of genes and functional enrichment for gene ontology terms were assessed. Compared with other protocols, M1 macrophages polarized using PMA (61.3 ng/mL) and IFN-γ along with LPS had the highest expression of M1-associated regulatory genes and genes for M1 cytokines and chemokines. According to the GO enrichment analysis, genes involved in defensive and inflammatory processes were differentially expressed in these Mφ. However, all three chosen protocols which use Vit D

Indexed as

differential gene expressionM1 macrophagesM2 macrophagespolarization protocolRNA-seqtranscriptomic analysis

Identifiers

PMID36831144
PMCPMC9953291
OpenAlexW4321372051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.