ArticleBiomedicines2023
Application of Convolutional Neural Networks Using Action Potential Shape for In-Silico Proarrhythmic Risk Assessment.
Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multiscale computational model of cardiac electrophysiology for drug-induced pro-arrhythmic risk stratification.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Article
- Article
- Neural network emulation of the human ventricular cardiomyocyte action potential: a tool for more efficient computation in pharmacological studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a convolutional neural network (CNN) model using action potential (AP) shapes as input for proarrhythmic risk assessment, considering the hypothesis that machine-learning features automatically extracted from AP shapes contain more meaningful information than do manually extracted indicators. We used 28 drugs listed in the comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CiPA), consisting of eight high-risk, eleven intermediate-risk, and nine low-risk torsadogenic drugs. We performed drug simulations to generate AP shapes using experimental drug data, obtaining 2000 AP shapes per drug. The proposed CNN model was trained to classify the TdP risk into three levels, high-, intermediate-, and low-risk, based on in silico AP shapes generated using 12 drugs. We then evaluated the performance of the proposed model for 16 drugs. The classification accuracy of the proposed CNN model was excellent for high- and low-risk drugs, with AUCs of 0.914 and 0.951, respectively. The model performance for intermediate-risk drugs was good, at 0.814. Our proposed model can accurately assess the TdP risks of drugs from in silico AP shapes, reflecting the pharmacokinetics of ionic currents. We need to secure more drugs for future studies to improve the TdP-risk-assessment robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.