Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36830930›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Theta Activity Dynamics during Embedded Response Plan Processing in Tourette Syndrome.

Paul Wendiggensen, Theresa Paulus, Annet Bluschke, Adam Takacs, Eszter Toth-Faber, Anne Weissbach, Tobias Bäumer, Christian Frings, Veit Roessner, Alexander Münchau and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul WendiggensenCognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7155-1067
Theresa PaulusInstitute of Systems Motor Science, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Annet BluschkeCognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany.
Adam TakacsCognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6575-727X
Eszter Toth-FaberDoctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1053 Budapest, Hungary.
Anne WeissbachInstitute of Systems Motor Science, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Tobias BäumerInstitute of Systems Motor Science, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Christian FringsCognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany.
Veit RoessnerCognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany.
Alexander MünchauInstitute of Systems Motor Science, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Christian BesteCognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, 01309 Dresden, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEEötvös Loránd University · HUUniversität Trier · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FOR 2698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) is a neuropsychiatric disorder. Because motor signs are the defining feature of GTS, addressing the neurophysiology of motor processes is central to understanding GTS. The integration of voluntary motor processes is subject to so-called "binding problems", i.e., how different aspects of an action are integrated. This was conceptualized in the theory of event coding, in which 'action files' accomplish the integration of motor features. We examined the functional neuroanatomical architecture of EEG theta band activity related to action file processing in GTS patients and healthy controls. Whereas, in keeping with previous data, behavioral performance during action file processing did not differ between GTS and controls, underlying patterns of neural activity were profoundly different. Superior parietal regions (BA7) were predominantly engaged in healthy controls, but superior frontal regions (BA9, BA10) in GTS indicated that the processing of different motor feature codes was central for action file processing in healthy controls, whereas episodic processing was more relevant in GTS. The data suggests a cascade of cognitive branching in fronto-polar areas followed by episodic processing in superior frontal regions in GTS. Patients with GTS accomplish the integration of motor plans via qualitatively different neurophysiological processes.

Indexed as

bindingEEGmotor processestheory of event codingTourette syndrome

Identifiers

PMID36830930
PMCPMC9953245
OpenAlexW4318482890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.