Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36830465›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Rumen Fermentation Parameters Prediction Model for Dairy Cows Using a Stacking Ensemble Learning Method.

Yuxuan Wang, Jianzhao Zhou, Xinjie Wang, Qingyuan Yu, Yukun Sun, Yang Li, Yonggen Zhang, Weizheng Shen, Xiaoli Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development of an Alternative In Vitro Rumen Fermentation Prediction Model.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuxuan WangCollege of Electric and Information, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Jianzhao ZhouCollege of Electric and Information, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Xinjie WangCollege of Electric and Information, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Qingyuan YuCollege of Animal Sciences and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Yukun SunCollege of Animal Sciences and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Yang LiCollege of Animal Sciences and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Yonggen ZhangCollege of Animal Sciences and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Weizheng ShenCollege of Electric and Information, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Xiaoli WeiCollege of Electric and Information, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Northeast Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Scientific Research Developmental Fund LBH-Q21062the earmarked fund CARS36the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFD1301104 and 2019YFE0125600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and methane are the main products of rumen fermentation. Quantitative studies of rumen fermentation parameters can be performed using in vitro techniques and machine learning methods. The currently proposed models suffer from poor generalization ability due to the small number of samples. In this study, a prediction model for rumen fermentation parameters (methane, acetic acid (AA), and propionic acid (PA)) of dairy cows is established using the stacking ensemble learning method and in vitro techniques. Four factors related to the nutrient level of total mixed rations (TMRs) are selected as inputs to the model: neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), crude protein (CP), and dry matter (DM). The comparison of the prediction results of the stacking model and base learners shows that the stacking ensemble learning method has better prediction results for rumen methane (coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.928, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.968 mL/g), AA (R2 = 0.888, RMSE = 1.975 mmol/L) and PA (R2 = 0.924, RMSE = 0.74 mmol/L). And the stacking model simulates the variation of methane and VFAs in relation to the dietary fiber content. To demonstrate the robustness of the model in the case of small samples, an independent validation experiment was conducted. The stacking model successfully simulated the transition of rumen fermentation type and the change of methane content under different concentrate-to-forage (C:F) ratios of TMR. These results suggest that the rumen fermentation parameter prediction model can be used as a decision-making basis for the optimization of dairy cow diet compositions, rapid screening of methane emission reduction, feed beneficial to dairy cow health, and improvement of feed utilization.

Indexed as

dairy cattlemethanerumen metabolismtotal mixed rationvolatile fatty acid

Identifiers

PMID36830465
PMCPMC9951746
OpenAlexW4321104498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.