Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36830442›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Comprehensive Comparative Analysis Sheds Light on the Patterns of Microsatellite Distribution across Birds Based on the Chromosome-Level Genomes.

Kaize Feng, Chuang Zhou, Lei Wang, Chunhui Zhang, Zhixiong Yang, Zhengrui Hu, Bisong Yue, Yongjie Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaize FengKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8479-6848
Chuang ZhouSichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1186-5459
Lei WangSichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Chunhui ZhangSichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology on Endangered Wildlife, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Zhixiong YangKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Zhengrui HuKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Bisong YueKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Yongjie WuKey Laboratory of Bioresources and Ecoenvironment (Ministry of Education), College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0297-2319
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32270454the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) 2019QZKK0501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsatellites (SSRs) are widely distributed in the genomes of organisms and are an important genetic basis for genome evolution and phenotypic adaptation. Although the distribution patterns of microsatellites have been investigated in many phylogenetic lineages, they remain unclear within the morphologically and physiologically diverse avian clades. Here, based on high-quality chromosome-level genomes, we examined the microsatellite distribution patterns for 53 birds from 16 orders. The results demonstrated that each type of SSR had the same ratio between taxa. For example, the frequency of imperfect SSRs (I-SSRs) was 69.90-84.61%, while perfect SSRs (P-SSRs) were 14.86-28.13% and compound SSRs (C-SSRs) were 0.39-2.24%. Mononucleotide SSRs were dominant for perfect SSRs (32.66-76.48%) in most bird species (98.11%), and A(n) was the most abundant repeat motifs of P-SSRs in all birds (5.42-68.22%). Our study further confirmed that the abundance and diversity of microsatellites were less effected by evolutionary history but its length. The number of P-SSRs decreased with increasing repeat times, and longer P-SSRs motifs had a higher variability coefficient of the repeat copy number and lower diversity, indicating that longer motifs tended to have more stable preferences in avian genomes. We also found that P-SSRs were mainly distributed at the gene ends, and the functional annotation for these genes demonstrated that they were related to signal transduction and cellular process. In conclusion, our research provided avian SSR distribution patterns, which will help to explore the genetic basis for phenotypic diversity in birds.

Indexed as

birdschromosome-level genomedistribution patternfunctional annotationmicrosatellite

Identifiers

PMID36830442
PMCPMC9951716
OpenAlexW4320729488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.