Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36830248›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Nanoparticles as a Promising Strategy to Mitigate Biotic Stress in Agriculture.

Gonzalo Tortella, Olga Rubilar, Joana C Pieretti, Paola Fincheira, Bianca de Melo Santana, Martín A Fernández-Baldo, Adalberto Benavides-Mendoza, Amedea B Seabra

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. NMR-Based Metabolomic Approach to Study Growth ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Graphene-Cu Nanocomposites Induce Tolerance againstPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Gonzalo TortellaCentro de Excelencia en Investigación Biotecnológica Aplicada al Medio Ambiente (CIBAMA), Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad de La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4811230, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-7069-7454
Olga RubilarCentro de Excelencia en Investigación Biotecnológica Aplicada al Medio Ambiente (CIBAMA), Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad de La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4811230, Chile.
Joana C PierettiCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC (UFABC), Avenida dos Estados, Saint Andrew 09210-580, Brazil.
Paola FincheiraCentro de Excelencia en Investigación Biotecnológica Aplicada al Medio Ambiente (CIBAMA), Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad de La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4811230, Chile.
Bianca de Melo SantanaCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC (UFABC), Avenida dos Estados, Saint Andrew 09210-580, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9848-6488
Martín A Fernández-BaldoInstituto de Química San Luis (INQUISAL), Departamento de Química, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, CONICET, Chacabuco 917, San Luis D5700BWS, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-0385-2391
Adalberto Benavides-MendozaDepartment of Horticulture, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Saltillo 25315, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2729-4315
Amedea B SeabraCenter for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC (UFABC), Avenida dos Estados, Saint Andrew 09210-580, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-0380
Universidad de La Frontera · CLUniversidade Federal do ABC · BRConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro · MX

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo FOVI220003University of La Frontera DI22-1001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles are recognized due to their particular physical and chemical properties, which are conferred due to their size, in the range of nanometers. Nanoparticles are recognized for their application in medicine, electronics, and the textile industry, among others, but also in agriculture. The application of nanoparticles as nanofertilizers and biostimulants can help improve growth and crop productivity, and it has therefore been mentioned as an essential tool to control the adverse effects of abiotic stress. However, nanoparticles have also been noted for their exceptional antimicrobial properties. Therefore, this work reviews the state of the art of different nanoparticles that have shown the capacity to control biotic stress in plants. In this regard, metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, and others, such as silica nanoparticles, have been described. Moreover, uptake and translocation are covered. Finally, future remarks about the studies on nanoparticles and their beneficial role in biotic stress management are made.

Indexed as

agricultureantimicrobialbiostimulantsbiotic stresscropsnanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID36830248
PMCPMC9951924
OpenAlexW4319298238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.