ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Use of Systemic Antibiotics in Patients with COVID-19 in Colombia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic use in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2 in a Brazilian University Hospital (2020-2021).Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Pathogenic and periodontal bacteria may contribute to the fatal outcome of critically ill elderly COVID-19 patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotics are frequently prescribed to patients with COVID-19. The aim was to determine the pattern of use of systemic antibiotics in a group of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Colombia between 2020-2022. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study designed to identify antibiotics prescription patterns for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 treated in eight clinics in Colombia. The AWaRe tool of the World Health Organization (WHO) was used to classify the antibiotics. A total of 10,916 patients were included. The median age was 57 years, and 56.4% were male. A total of 57.5% received antibiotics, especially ampicillin/sulbactam (58.8%) and clarithromycin (47.9%). Most of the antibiotics were classified as Watch (65.1%), followed by Access (32.6%) and Reserve (2.4%). Men (OR: 1.29; 95%CI: 1.17-1.43), older adults (OR: 1.67; 95%CI: 1.48-1.88), patients with dyspnea (OR: 1.26; 95%CI: 1.13-1.41), rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.94; 95%CI: 1.17-3.20), and high blood pressure at admission (OR: 1.45; 95%CI: 1.29-1.63), patients treated in-hospital (OR: 5.15; 95%CI: 4.59-5.77), patients admitted to the ICU (OR: 10.48; 95%CI: 8.82-12.45), patients treated with systemic glucocorticoids (OR: 3.60; 95%CI: 3.21-4.03) and vasopressors (OR: 2.10; 95%CI: 1.60-2.75), and patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation (OR: 2.37; 95%CI: 1.82-3.09) were more likely to receive a systemic antibiotic. Most of the patients diagnosed with COVID-19 received antibiotics, despite evidence showing that bacterial coinfection is rare. Antibiotics from the Watch group predominated, a practice that goes against WHO recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.