Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36829706›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Gait Event Prediction Using Surface Electromyography in Parkinsonian Patients.

Stefan Haufe, Ioannis U Isaias, Franziska Pellegrini, Chiara Palmisano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advances in Biomechanics-Based Motion Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefan HaufeUncertainty, Inverse Modeling and Machine Learning Group, Technical University of Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1470-9195
Ioannis U IsaiasDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg and Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3552-5144
Franziska PellegriniBerlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Chiara PalmisanoDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg and Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 424778381-TRR 295European Resuscitation Council 758985German Excellence Initiative to the Graduate School of Life Sciences, University of Würzburg n.a.Grigioni Foundation for Parkinson's disease n.a.New York University School of Medicine and The Marlene and Paolo Fresco Institute for Parkin-son's and Movement Disorders n.a.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait disturbances are common manifestations of Parkinson's disease (PD), with unmet therapeutic needs. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are capable of monitoring gait, but they lack neurophysiological information that may be crucial for studying gait disturbances in these patients. Here, we present a machine learning approach to approximate IMU angular velocity profiles and subsequently gait events using electromyographic (EMG) channels during overground walking in patients with PD. We recorded six parkinsonian patients while they walked for at least three minutes. Patient-agnostic regression models were trained on temporally embedded EMG time series of different combinations of up to five leg muscles bilaterally (i.e., tibialis anterior, soleus, gastrocnemius medialis, gastrocnemius lateralis, and vastus lateralis). Gait events could be detected with high temporal precision (median displacement of <50 ms), low numbers of missed events (<2%), and next to no false-positive event detections (<0.1%). Swing and stance phases could thus be determined with high fidelity (median F1-score of ~0.9). Interestingly, the best performance was obtained using as few as two EMG probes placed on the left and right vastus lateralis. Our results demonstrate the practical utility of the proposed EMG-based system for gait event prediction, which allows the simultaneous acquisition of an electromyographic signal to be performed. This gait analysis approach has the potential to make additional measurement devices such as IMUs and force plates less essential, thereby reducing financial and preparation overheads and discomfort factors in gait studies.

Indexed as

electromyographygait-phase predictioninertial measurement unitsmachine learningParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID36829706
PMCPMC9951979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.