Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36829676›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Computing Drug-Drug Similarity from Patient-Centric Data.

Yousef Asiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yousef AsiriDepartment of Computer Science, Najran University, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7955-4468

Funding

Najran University NU/NRP/SERC/11/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern biology and medicine, drug-drug similarity is a major task with various applications in pharmaceutical drug development. Various direct and indirect sources of evidence obtained from drug-centric data such as side effects, drug interactions, biological targets, and chemical structures are used in the current methods to measure the level of drug-drug similarity. This paper proposes a computational method to measure drug-drug similarity using a novel source of evidence that is obtained from patient-centric data. More specifically, patients' narration of their thoughts, opinions, and experience with drugs in social media are explored as a potential source to compute drug-drug similarity. Online healthcare communities were used to extract a dataset of patients' reviews on anti-epileptic drugs. The collected dataset is preprocessed through Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and four text similarity methods are applied to measure the similarities among them. The obtained similarities are then used to generate drug-drug similarity-based ranking matrices which are analyzed through Pearson correlation, to answer questions related to the overall drug-drug similarity and the accuracy of the four similarity measures. To evaluate the obtained drug-drug similarities, they are compared with the corresponding ground-truth similarities obtained from DrugSimDB, a well-known drug-drug similarity tool that is based on drug-centric data. The results provide evidence on the feasibility of patient-centric data from social media as a novel source for computing drug-drug similarity.

Indexed as

drug-drug similaritynatural language processingonline healthcare communitiessocial mediatext-based analysis

Identifiers

PMID36829676
PMCPMC9952733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.