ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Deep Learning-Based Medical Images Segmentation of Musculoskeletal Anatomical Structures: A Survey of Bottlenecks and Strategies.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerating Volumetric Medical Image Annotation via Short-Long Memory SAM 2.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Proximal Bone Shape Asymmetry Analysis and Clinical Correlation with Cartilage Relaxation Times and Functional Activity.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Review
- Segmentation of the thoracolumbar fascia in ultrasound imaging: a deep learning approach.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal applications: a primer for radiologists.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Review
- Estimation of Trabecular Bone Volume with Dual-Echo Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Significantly Correlates with High-Resolution Computed Tomography (CT).Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based automatic measurement system for patellar height: a multicenter retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of 128-Slice Single-Source CT for the Detection of Dislocated Bucket Handle Meniscal Tears in the Setting of an Acute Knee Trauma-Correlation with MRI and Arthroscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
By leveraging the recent development of artificial intelligence algorithms, several medical sectors have benefited from using automatic segmentation tools from bioimaging to segment anatomical structures. Segmentation of the musculoskeletal system is key for studying alterations in anatomical tissue and supporting medical interventions. The clinical use of such tools requires an understanding of the proper method for interpreting data and evaluating their performance. The current systematic review aims to present the common bottlenecks for musculoskeletal structures analysis (e.g., small sample size, data inhomogeneity) and the related strategies utilized by different authors. A search was performed using the PUBMED database with the following keywords: deep learning, musculoskeletal system, segmentation. A total of 140 articles published up until February 2022 were obtained and analyzed according to the PRISMA framework in terms of anatomical structures, bioimaging techniques, pre/post-processing operations, training/validation/testing subset creation, network architecture, loss functions, performance indicators and so on. Several common trends emerged from this survey; however, the different methods need to be compared and discussed based on each specific case study (anatomical region, medical imaging acquisition setting, study population, etc.). These findings can be used to guide clinicians (as end users) to better understand the potential benefits and limitations of these tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.