Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36829631›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Deep Learning-Based Medical Images Segmentation of Musculoskeletal Anatomical Structures: A Survey of Bottlenecks and Strategies.

Lorenza Bonaldi, Andrea Pretto, Carmelo Pirri, Francesca Uccheddu, Chiara Giulia Fontanella, Carla Stecco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal applications: a primer for radiologists.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorenza BonaldiDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, Via F. Marzolo 9, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Andrea PrettoDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Carmelo PirriDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Via A. Gabelli 65, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0119-6549
Francesca UcchedduDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7604-5182
Chiara Giulia FontanellaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Via Venezia 1, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3844-9842
Carla SteccoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Via A. Gabelli 65, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8767-4555

Funding

Ministry of Education, Universities and Research FISR2019_03221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By leveraging the recent development of artificial intelligence algorithms, several medical sectors have benefited from using automatic segmentation tools from bioimaging to segment anatomical structures. Segmentation of the musculoskeletal system is key for studying alterations in anatomical tissue and supporting medical interventions. The clinical use of such tools requires an understanding of the proper method for interpreting data and evaluating their performance. The current systematic review aims to present the common bottlenecks for musculoskeletal structures analysis (e.g., small sample size, data inhomogeneity) and the related strategies utilized by different authors. A search was performed using the PUBMED database with the following keywords: deep learning, musculoskeletal system, segmentation. A total of 140 articles published up until February 2022 were obtained and analyzed according to the PRISMA framework in terms of anatomical structures, bioimaging techniques, pre/post-processing operations, training/validation/testing subset creation, network architecture, loss functions, performance indicators and so on. Several common trends emerged from this survey; however, the different methods need to be compared and discussed based on each specific case study (anatomical region, medical imaging acquisition setting, study population, etc.). These findings can be used to guide clinicians (as end users) to better understand the potential benefits and limitations of these tools.

Indexed as

anatomical structuresartificial intelligenceCTdeep learningmedical imagingMRImusculoskeletal systemsegmentationultrasonographyX-ray

Identifiers

PMID36829631
PMCPMC9952222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.