Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36829625›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Primary Hepatocyte Isolation and Cultures: Technical Aspects, Challenges and Advancements.

Impreet Kaur, Ashwini Vasudevan, Preety Rawal, Dinesh M Tripathi, Seeram Ramakrishna, Savneet Kaur, Shiv K Sarin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Research progress on bioartificial liver].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Impreet KaurDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi 110070, India.
Ashwini VasudevanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi 110070, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5310-8662
Preety RawalSchool of Biotechnology, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida 201312, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4177-5139
Dinesh M TripathiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi 110070, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0897-6959
Seeram RamakrishnaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117581, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8479-8686
Savneet KaurDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi 110070, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9863-2772
Shiv K SarinDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi 110070, India.

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research 45/5/2020-PHY/BMSIndian Council of Medical Research 5/3/8/27/ITR-F/2022-ITRScience and Engineering Research Board SRG/2019/002128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocytes are differentiated cells that account for 80% of the hepatic volume and perform all major functions of the liver. In vivo, after an acute insult, adult hepatocytes retain their ability to proliferate and participate in liver regeneration. However, in vitro, prolonged culture and proliferation of viable and functional primary hepatocytes have remained the major and the most challenging goal of hepatocyte-based cell therapies and liver tissue engineering. The first functional cultures of rat primary hepatocytes between two layers of collagen gel, also termed as the "sandwich cultures", were reported in 1989. Since this study, several technical developments including choice of hydrogels, type of microenvironment, growth factors and culture conditions, mono or co-cultures of hepatocytes along with other supporting cell types have evolved for both rat and human primary hepatocytes in recent years. All these improvements have led to a substantial improvement in the number, life-span and hepatic functions of these cells in vitro for several downstream applications. In the current review, we highlight the details, limitations and prospects of different technical strategies being used in primary hepatocyte cultures. We discuss the use of newer biomaterials as scaffolds for efficient culture of primary hepatocytes. We also describe the derivation of mature hepatocytes from other cellular sources such as induced pluripotent stem cells, bone marrow stem cells and 3D liver organoids. Finally, we also explain the use of perfusion-based bioreactor systems and bioengineering strategies to support the long-term function of hepatocytes in 3D conditions.

Indexed as

hepatocyte culturehepatocyte isolationliver on chiporganoidsperfusion bioreactorprimary hepatocytes

Identifiers

PMID36829625
PMCPMC9952008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.