Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36829541›Full record

ArticleBiology2023

Plastid Phylogenomic Insights into the Inter-Tribal Relationships of Plantaginaceae.

Pingxuan Xie, Lilei Tang, Yanzhen Luo, Changkun Liu, Hanjing Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Insights into phylogenetic relationships ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Complete chloroplast genome of a coastal herb,Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pingxuan XieCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0034-8288
Lilei TangCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Yanzhen LuoCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Changkun LiuKey Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Hanjing YanCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0436-4971

Funding

the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province 2021B0707010008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plantaginaceae, consisting of 12 tribes, is a diverse, cosmopolitan family. To date, the inter-tribal relationships of this family have been unresolved, and the plastome structure and composition within Plantaginaceae have seldom been comprehensively investigated. In this study, we compared the plastomes from 41 Plantaginaceae species (including 6 newly sequenced samples and 35 publicly representative species) representing 11 tribes. To clarify the inter-tribal relationships of Plantaginaceae, we inferred phylogenic relationships based on the concatenated and coalescent analyses of 68 plastid protein-coding genes. PhyParts analysis was performed to assess the level of concordance and conflict among gene trees across the species tree. The results indicate that most plastomes of Plantaginaceae are largely conserved in terms of genome structure and gene content. In contrast to most previous studies, a robust phylogeny was recovered using plastome data, providing new insights for better understanding the inter-tribal relationships of Plantaginaceae. Both concatenated and coalescent phylogenies favored the sister relationship between Plantagineae and Digitalideae, as well as between Veroniceae and Hemiphragmeae. Sibthorpieae diverged into a separate branch which was sister to a clade comprising the four tribes mentioned above. Furthermore, the sister relationship between Russelieae and Cheloneae is strongly supported. The results of PhyParts showed gene tree congruence and conflict to varying degrees, but most plastid genes were uninformative for phylogenetic nodes, revealing the defects of previous studies using single or multiple plastid DNA sequences to infer the phylogeny of Plantaginaceae.

Indexed as

DigitalideaeHemiphragmeaephylogenyPlantagineaeplastomeSibthorpieaeVeroniceae

Identifiers

PMID36829541
PMCPMC9953724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.