Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36829343›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Application of the COM-B Framework to Understand Facilitators and Barriers for Practising Physical Activity among Pregnant Women and Midwives Participating in the WELL-DONE! Study.

Sofia Marini, Rossella Messina, Alice Masini, Francesca Scognamiglio, Isotta Caravita, Vincenza Leccese, Giorgia Soldà, Dila Parma, Virginia Bertini, Lawrence Matthew Scheier and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sofia MariniDepartment for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, 47921 Rimini, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7025-4271
Rossella MessinaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Visa San Giacomo 12, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Alice MasiniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Visa San Giacomo 12, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1238-3777
Francesca ScognamiglioDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Visa San Giacomo 12, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2704-1369
Isotta CaravitaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Vincenza LecceseDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Giorgia SoldàDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Visa San Giacomo 12, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5951-1062
Dila ParmaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Virginia BertiniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Lawrence Matthew ScheierLARS Research Institute, Inc., Sun City, AZ 85351, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2254-0123
Laura DallolioDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Visa San Giacomo 12, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7555-9659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regular physical activity (PA) is protective and reduces disease burden but remains a challenge for pregnant women (PW). According to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, PW without contraindications should practice 150 min of moderate PA per week. Nonetheless, PA levels are concerningly low among PW. The aim of this study was to investigate PW's and midwives' perceptions regarding PA and recommended guidelines, and use this information to inform future health promotion strategies. We recruited 10 PW and 10 midwives to participate in online focus groups conducted between July 2020 and April 2021. Focus group probes and data analysis were guided by the COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation-behaviour) framework. The majority of the sample had already practised PA, recognized the importance of PA during pregnancy, and considered the WHO guidelines reasonable. Notwithstanding, PW wanted more specific instruction on PA and desired opportunities to practice. Additional barriers reported by PW included low self-efficacy and lack of motivation. Midwives considered the lack of specific knowledge and confidence in managing PA as the main obstacles. The current findings suggest that PW and midwives need specific training in PA to overcome both psychological and physical barriers. Midwives play a vital role in educating and encouraging PA among PW.

Indexed as

COM–B modelfeasibilityfocus group methodhealth promotion interventionmidwivesphysical activitypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36829343
PMCPMC9952666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.