Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36829321›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Working Memory Capacity Depends on Attention Control, but Not Selective Attention.

Alexander I Kotyusov, Dauren Kasanov, Alexandra I Kosachenko, Anastasia S Gashkova, Yuri G Pavlov, Sergey Malykh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The relation between cognitive functioning and activities of daily living in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia: a meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. The effects of dual-task training with different task priorities on physical performance and cognitive status in patients with Parkinson's disease: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander I KotyusovAcademic and Research Laboratory of Neurotechnology, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg 620000, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7007-824X
Dauren KasanovAcademic and Research Laboratory of Neurotechnology, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg 620000, Russia.
Alexandra I KosachenkoAcademic and Research Laboratory of Neurotechnology, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg 620000, Russia.
Anastasia S GashkovaCenter of Population Research, Ural Institute of Humanities, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia.
Yuri G PavlovAcademic and Research Laboratory of Neurotechnology, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg 620000, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3896-5145
Sergey MalykhDevelopmental Behavioral Genetics Lab, Psychological Institute of Russian Academy of Education, 9-4 Mokhovaya str., Moscow 125009, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 17-78-30028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory and attention are interrelated constructs that are sometimes even considered indistinguishable. Since attention is not a uniform construct, it is possible that different types of attention affect working memory capacity differently. To clarify this issue, we investigated the relationship between working memory capacity and various components of attention. The sample consisted of 136 healthy adult participants aged 18 to 37 years (M = 20.58, SD = 2.74). Participants performed tasks typically used to assess working memory (operation span, change detection, simple digit span, and adaptive digit span tasks), selective attention (visual search task), and attention control (Stroop and antisaccade tasks). We tested several models with working memory and attention, either as a unitary factor or being divided into selective attention and attention control factors. A confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model with three latent variables-working memory capacity, attention control, and selective attention-fit the data best. Results showed that working memory and attention are distinct but correlated constructs: working memory capacity was only related to attention control, whereas attention control was related to both constructs. We propose that differences in working memory capacity are determined only by the ability to maintain attention on the task, while differences in the ability to filter out non-salient distractors are not related to working memory capacity.

Indexed as

attention controlindividual differencesselective attentionworking memory

Identifiers

PMID36829321
PMCPMC9952259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.