Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36829194›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2023

Emergency separation of conjoined twins in a tertiary hospital in Indonesia: three case reports.

Andi Ade Wijaya Ramlan, Raihanita Zahra, Kshetra Rinaldhy, Christopher Kapuangan, Rahendra, Komang Ayu Ferdiana, Ahmad Yani

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Delivery room resuscitation of conjoined twins.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andi Ade Wijaya RamlanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jl Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta Pusat, DKI, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia. andi.ade@ui.ac.id.ORCID 0000-0002-7216-4763
Raihanita ZahraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jl Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta Pusat, DKI, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.
Kshetra RinaldhyDr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Christopher KapuanganDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jl Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta Pusat, DKI, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.
RahendraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jl Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta Pusat, DKI, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.
Komang Ayu FerdianaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jl Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta Pusat, DKI, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.
Ahmad YaniDr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
University of Indonesia · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency separation of conjoined twins is performed when one twin is already dead or dying and threatens the survival of the other. The particular decision to perform an emergency separation of conjoined twins provides an ethical dilemma that needs special attention. Adding to the complexity of surgical and postsurgical management in emergency separation, ethical and sociocultural aspects further complicate decision-making. CASE PRESENTATION: From 1987 to 2022, 18 conjoined twin separations were performed in our centre. This paper describes three conjoined twin emergency separations. In the first case of thoracoomphalopagus babies at nine days of age, one baby was diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis with frequent desaturation and seizures, and the other baby was healthy. Emergency separation was performed on the twelfth day of age; unfortunately, neither baby survived the surgery. In the second case, emergency separation was performed on the 110th day of life due to sepsis in one baby. The nonseptic twin passed away six hours after surgery, while the septic twin died 12 days after surgery due to wound dehiscence and abdominal sepsis. The third case was of an omphalopagus conjoined twin with a parasitic twin. The healthy baby was deemed nonviable but found to be healthy upon birth. Immediate emergency separation was performed at 2 h of age. The living baby survived the surgery but passed away two months later.

conclusionsWhen separation is deemed necessary to save one twin, it becomes difficult to apply standard ethical medical reasoning. The decision to separate results in most cases in very high-risk surgeries with poor outcomes during surgery and postsurgery. Compounded by the complexity of the case, sociocultural and religious aspects further add to the dynamics of decision-making. A multidisciplinary team must work together with a health ethics committee and navigate through this ethical conundrum with the patient and family at its decision-making centre to decide on the best plan of care.

Indexed as

SepsisTwins, ConjoinedHealth StatusHumansIndonesiaInfantInfant, NewbornTertiary Care CentersCase reportConjoined twinsEmergency separationEthics

Identifiers

PMID36829194
PMCPMC9960702
OpenAlexW4321996799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.