Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36829138›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Sociodemographic differences in Covid-19 vaccine uptake in Denmark: a nationwide register-based cohort study.

Mie Agermose Gram, Ida Rask Moustsen-Helms, Palle Valentiner-Branth, Hanne-Dorthe Emborg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Temporal trends in socioeconomic inequalities and risk of infection after hip fracture surgery: a nationwide cohort study, 2010-2021.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Between intention and action: the paradoxes of female vaccination.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mie Agermose GramDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark. miag@ssi.dk.
Ida Rask Moustsen-HelmsDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Palle Valentiner-BranthDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Hanne-Dorthe EmborgDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Statens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCovid-19 vaccination is the main strategy to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to examine sociodemographic differences in Covid-19 vaccine uptake among all individuals invited for Covid-19 vaccination in Denmark.

methodsThis study was designed as a nationwide register-based cohort study. The study population included all Danish residents aged 12 years or above in Denmark between December 27, 2020 and October 20, 2021. Individuals who died during the study period before receiving an invitation for Covid-19 vaccination were excluded. Associations between sociodemographic factors and Covid-19 vaccination uptake were analyzed using logistic regression models adjusting for age, sex, immigration status, educational level, disposable income and history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

resultsThe study population included 5,164,558 individuals. The overall vaccination coverage was 87.1% by October 20, 2021. In the full adjusted logistic regression models, the highest ORs for non-vaccination were observed among individuals aged 12-24 years (OR: 8.99 (95% CI: 8.76-9.23)), descendants of non-western immigrants (OR: 5.26 (95% CI: 5.18-5.33)), individuals who never had a PCR-test performed (OR: 2.93 (95% CI: 2.90-2.96)), individuals with primary school as highest completed educational level (OR: 2.87 (95% CI: 2.83-2.91)) and individuals with disposable income < 33,605 EUR (OR: 3.72 (95% CI: 3.52-3.93)).

conclusionOverall, the Covid-19 vaccine uptake was high in Denmark. However, large sociodemographic differences in the vaccine uptake exist. The youngest age groups had the lowest vaccination coverage. Furthermore, the impact of the sociodemographic factors was more pronounced in the youngest age groups. The identified determinants may be used to design policies to help maximize the vaccination coverage.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCohort StudiesDenmarkHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesCovid-19 vaccinationImmigrantsSocial determinants of healthSociodemographic factorsVaccination coverage

Identifiers

PMID36829138
PMCPMC9955526
OpenAlexW4321782270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.