Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36829103›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2023

Perioperative anaphylactic reactions to central venous and pulmonary artery catheters containing chlorhexidine, sulfadiazine, or latex: a historical cohort study.

Terrique M Pinnock, Gerald W Volcheck, Mark M Smith, Andrew W Murray, Johnathan R Renew, Bradford B Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Silver sulfadiazine in modern dermatology.Dermatology online journal · 2025
    Review
  3. Perioperative anaphylaxis: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Terrique M PinnockSchool of Medicine, The City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, USA.
Gerald W VolcheckDivision of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mark M SmithDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Andrew W MurrayDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
Johnathan R RenewDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Bradford B SmithDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA. smith.bradford@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7693-4331
Mayo Clinic Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USCity University of New York · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research MSARF-10-01-2021-Pinnock
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCentral venous catheters (CVCs) and pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) containing chlorhexidine, silver sulfadiazine, or latex can cause perioperative anaphylaxis. We examined the incidence of and outcomes associated with anaphylaxis caused by CVCs/PACs.

methodsIn a historical cohort study, we retrospectively identified adult patients fitted with CVCs/PACs at the Mayo Clinics in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida from 1 January 2008 to 1 March 2018. Potential and confirmed cases of perioperative anaphylactic reactions were individually reviewed and classified.

resultsDuring the study period, 39,505 procedures were performed during which CVCs/PACs were inserted. Of these, 2,937 patients with pre-existing chlorhexidine, sulfonamide (sulfa), and/or latex allergies had CVCs/PACs inserted that contained these substances. Perioperative anaphylaxis, in which CVCs/PACs were the confirmed or potential causative agent, occurred during 53 procedures. Seven patients had a preoperatively reported sulfa or latex allergy; no patients had a preoperative chlorhexidine allergy. Six of the seven patients with reported allergies to sulfa or latex had a CVC/PAC inserted that contained these substances. Twenty-four patients with anaphylaxis had postoperative allergic disease consultation; ten of these (42%) underwent skin testing.

conclusionPerioperative anaphylactic reactions related to CVCs/PACs containing chlorhexidine, silver sulfadiazine, or latex were rare in this large historical cohort study. We identified 2,937 patients with pre-existing chlorhexidine, sulfa, and/or latex allergies and had CVCs/PACs inserted that contained these substances. Although few cases of perioperative anaphylaxis attributable to these substances were observed in patients with corresponding allergies, the potential for substantial complication exists. Providers should be aware of the potential for these hidden exposures.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisCatheterization, Central VenousCentral Venous CathetersLatex HypersensitivityAdultChlorhexidineCohort StudiesHumansPulmonary ArteryRetrospective StudiesSilver SulfadiazineSulfadiazineChlorhexidineSilver SulfadiazineSulfadiazineanaphylaxiscentral venous catheterschlorhexidinelatexsulfadiazine

Identifiers

PMID36829103
OpenAlexW4321764916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.