ArticleNature reviews. Urology2023
Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance.
Article in Nature reviews. Urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of AI Tools in Citing Retracted Literature : Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Writing: Balancing Innovation and Efficiency with Integrity: Perspectives and Position Statements of Global Andrology Forum Expert Group.The world journal of men's health · 2026Article
- Postgraduate students' perceptions of artificial intelligence integration in research: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Applications of AI in urology.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence as team member versus manual screening to conduct systematic reviews in medical sciences.iScience · 2025Article
- Article
- Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence Use for In-House Ethics Checks of Journal Submissions.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Review
- Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Transforming hematological research documentation with large language models: an approach to scientific writing and data analysis.Blood research · 2025Review
- Strategies for advancing inclusive biodiversity research through equitable practices and collective responsibility.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024Article
- Addressing emerging issues in entomology: 2023 student debates.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2024Article
- How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools.JCPP advances · 2024Review
- Evaluation of information accuracy and clarity: ChatGPT responses to the most frequently asked questions about premature ejaculation.Sexual medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Large Language Model Performance and Reliability for Citations and References in Scholarly Writing: Cross-Disciplinary Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Diagnosis Unreliability of ChatGPT for Journal Evaluation.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2024Article
- Article
- The rise of artificial intelligence-driven health communication.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Article
- How artificial intelligence will affect the future of medical publishing.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36829078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.