Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36828992›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2023

On the interplay between time and space perception in discontinuous stimulus displays.

Wladimir Kirsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Space-time interference in action.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wladimir KirschInstitut für Psychologie III der Universität Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, D-97070, Würzburg, Germany. kirsch@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6449-5423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study examined whether and how the mutual perceptual biases of temporal and spatial information, known as the kappa and the tau effects, depend on the duration and spatial extent of sensory stimulation as well as on the magnitude of spatio-temporal discrepancy. Three small circles were presented in succession at different spatial positions. The time points of presentation and the spatial position of the second circle systematically varied. Participants judged either whether the temporal interval between the first and the second circle was longer than the interval between the second and the third circle (Experiment 1) or whether the spatial distance between the first and the second circle was larger than the distance between the second and the third circle (Experiment 2), or both in separate blocks of trials (Experiment 3). The impact of spatial information on temporal perception (i.e., the kappa effect) increased with velocity of motion presumably imputed by the participants to the static displays and decreased with spatio-temporal discrepancy. No inverse biases (i.e., no tau effects) were observed. These results are considered as an indication that integration of spatial and temporal signals follow the same basic principles as multisensory integration of redundant signals, such as those from vision and touch.

Indexed as

Space PerceptionTime PerceptionHumansPhotic StimulationTouchVision, OcularKappa effectSpace-time dependencyTau effect

Identifiers

PMID36828992
PMCPMC10584698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.