Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36828953›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2023

The Amblyopia Quality of Life (AmbQoL): Development and Content Validation of a Novel Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Use in Adult and Pediatric Amblyopia Populations.

Ann Webber, Sharan Randhawa, Federico Felizzi, Mercedesz Soos, Rob Arbuckle, Paul O'Brien, Richard Harrad, Nausheen Khuddus, Christine Bouchet, Charlotte Panter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. "Reading level is just one component": best practices for cognitive debriefing patient-reported outcome instruments with pediatric populations.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ann WebberSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3935-3615
Sharan RandhawaAdelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, Cheshire, UK. sharan.randhawa@adelphivalues.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0224-8061
Federico FelizziNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Mercedesz SoosAdelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9615-0908
Rob ArbuckleAdelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0345-2523
Paul O'BrienNovartis Ireland Ltd, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6064-8023
Richard HarradBristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Nausheen KhuddusFamily Focus Eye Care, NKB Services, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Christine BouchetNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9737-1179
Charlotte PanterAdelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7172-8937
Adelphi Group (United Kingdom) · GBNovartis (Switzerland) · CHBristol Eye Hospital · GBNovartis (Ireland) · IEQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmblyopia is a neurodevelopmental vision disorder, characterized by poor vision in one or both eyes. Given the lack of existing clinical outcome assessments (COA) considered fit-for-purpose for amblyopia clinical trials, this study developed new COAs to assess amblyopia symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impacts in adult and pediatric amblyopia populations that conform with best practice standards and regulatory guidelines.

methodsFindings from a targeted qualitative literature review informed the development of three versions of the new Amblyopia Quality of Life Questionnaire (AmbQoL): a patient-reported outcome measure (PRO) for individuals aged 13 years and older, a PRO for children aged 9-12 years, and an observer-reported outcome measure (ObsRO) for caregivers of children aged 4-8 years. Qualitative interviews were conducted with the target populations, and with ophthalmologists experienced in treating amblyopia patients to evaluate the content validity for further development of the AmbQoL. A translatability assessment was conducted to ensure cultural appropriateness and usability across multiple languages. Feedback from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was also sought on the instruments, and clinical experts provided input at key stages.

resultsInterviews were conducted with 112 patients/caregivers and ten ophthalmologists from the USA, France, and Germany. The instructions, items, and response options were well understood across all AmbQoL versions. Feedback from the patients, caregivers, ophthalmologists, the translatability assessment, the FDA, and the expert clinicians informed minor wording modifications to enhance clarity and translatability. Some items were removed due to low relevance. The study resulted in a 23-item adult/adolescent PRO, 24-item child PRO, and 12-item ObsRO, each employing a 7-day recall period.

conclusionEach AmbQoL version has documented support for its face and content validity for use in amblyopia populations aged ≥ 4 years. Further research is necessary to evaluate the psychometric measurement properties of the AmbQoL instruments to enable their use in amblyopia treatment trials.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaClinical Outcome Assessment (COA)Content validityHealth-related Quality of Life (HRQoL)InterviewObserver-reported Outcome (ObsRO)Patient-reported Outcome (PRO)PediatricsQualitative

Identifiers

PMID36828953
PMCPMC10011248
OpenAlexW4321791650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.