ArticleDrug safety2023
Early Detection of Adverse Drug Reaction Signals by Association Rule Mining Using Large-Scale Administrative Claims Data.
Article in Drug safety, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Discovery Approach in Healthcare Big Data to Identify Drug Safety and Drug Repurposing Signals.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance: a narrative review and practical experience with an expert-defined Bayesian network tool.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Review
- Possible Association Between Concomitant Use of SSRIs with NSAIDs and an Increased Risk of Adverse Events Among People with Depressive Disorders: Data Mining of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pharmacy-led interventions to reverse and prevent prescribing cascades in primary care: a proof-of-concept study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Adverse drug reaction signal detection via the long short-term memory model.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Predicting Drugs Suspected of Causing Adverse Drug Reactions Using Graph Features and Attention Mechanisms.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Safety of combined drug use in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases: an analysis based on the spontaneous reporting database of adverse drug reactions in Hubei Province.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- A Comparative Study Assessing the Incidence and Degree of Hyperkalemia in Patients on Unfractionated Heparin versus Low-Molecular Weight Heparin.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a leading cause of mortality worldwide and should be detected promptly to reduce health risks to patients. A data-mining approach using large-scale medical records might be a useful method for the early detection of ADRs. Many studies have analyzed medical records to detect ADRs; however, most of them have focused on a narrow range of ADRs, limiting their usefulness.
objectiveThis study aimed to identify methods for the early detection of a wide range of ADR signals.
methodsFirst, to evaluate the performance in signal detection of ADRs by data-mining, we attempted to create a gold standard based on clinical evidence. Second, association rule mining (ARM) was applied to patient symptoms and medications registered in claims data, followed by evaluating ADR signal detection performance.
resultsWe created a new gold standard consisting of 92 positive and 88 negative controls. In the assessment of ARM using claims data, the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve and the precision-recall curve were 0.80 and 0.83, respectively. If the detection criteria were defined as lift > 1, conviction > 1, and p-value < 0.05, ARM could identify 156 signals, of which 90 were true positive controls (sensitivity: 0.98, specificity: 0.25). Evaluation of the capability of ARM with short periods of data revealed that ARM could detect a greater number of positive controls than the conventional analysis method.
conclusionsARM of claims data may be effective in the early detection of a wide range of ADR signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.